Originally Posted by
PacificDude
Here's an interesting thought I had...
Gay couples can't naturally reproduce. So does that mean heterosexual couples are supposed to get all the benefits that come with marriage because they can naturally produce more taxpayers? So that would mean heterosexual couples are being used by a 'smoke & mirrors' benefit system? Irony?
This is meant as an entertaining argument.
h:
What about sterile couples? Or couples that choose not to reproduce? Should they not be allowed to married too? We had this discussion in my political science class back in college. Some homosexual couples adopt as well so why not let them pursue their happiness as heteros do? I just don't see the big deal but I guess that's because I know some very upstanding homosexuals.