Originally Posted by
spanky
It's only logical. Why would the law vary based on a person's sight.
Seemingly by your logic when you see a speed limit sign that means you can go that speed. If driver A can see better than driver B and can read the sign sooner does that mean he can legally drive the higher posted speed?
I've been ticketed for 54 in a 45 and I was approaching and could visually see a 55mph zone.
dont you have to have a certain sight % to be able to drive. and if you cant see that well then not license for you unless you get glasses.
so being able to see the sign shouldnt be a variable.
and im pretty sure you can be ticketed for driving with out being able to see to the legal limit.