read up on bowling for columbine. He misused a lot of shit to exploit his points. From election ads with Bush to NRA stuff. Mind you, I think Bush is a taint, just in case you think I'm some hardcore republican who is "hurt" by his "documentary" when in fact, I'm not a republican

I personally think a documentary shouldn't have to have stuff spliced together and old footage in order to make a point. I think, if the subject is strong, it should be able to stand on it's own.

my main point is not about his message. I think everyone should be able to say what they please in whichever medium, but to call his work a documentary is insulting to those who actually make real documentaries.