Originally Posted by cvchtchbck92
I'm a be a little skeptical. I know its fictional. But I think the author intentionally combines fact and fiction in the book to make a good portion of readers believe that some stuff in the book is fact. Or the combination just "accidently" makes readers believe it as fact. Come on, if you read a fictional book, but portions are factual, the facts from the fictional statements start to become distorted.
What fact? It is a ficticious story about a ficticious story. Last time I heard, the Bible was never "fact"