Thread: Ww Iii
View Single Post
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 08:36 PM
  #11  
MellowGold's Avatar
MellowGold
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DVPGSR
Iran is a threat and their Hitleresque President has already vowed to destroy Israel. Further Iran is a producer of terror aiding Hezbollah in terrorist attacks against Israel and elsewhere as well as fuelling the terrorist attacks in Iraq. Finally a nuclear armed Iran is not just a threat to Israel but also Europe and our bases in the Middle east and Turkey. This is something that cannot happen and appeasement is not an option. Ask Neville Chamberlain how well that worked with Hitler.
I'm sorry, but comparing the Iranian President to Hitler is absurd. There are big differences and you should be able to see them clearly.

I believe that it would be much more helpful if we look at the causes of the Muslim world's hate towards the west. Looking throughout history, we have continued to screw the Middle East time and time again after the Ottoman Empire fell. In the end, it is OUR fault that the Middle East is in the condition it is in now.

In addition, it would be worthwhile to examine what would happen AFTER we invade Iran. The leaders of Iran have popular backing. People love them. Imagine occupying a country in which nearly everyone in it wants us dead. Maybe MacArthur could pull it off, but the current administration surely could not. Furthermore, Islam does not exactly support democracy. People WANT religion in government. As we have also seen throughout history, religion and state do not mix well.

It is not a question of appeasement. It is simply a matter of not invading countries that do not like us.
Reply