Originally Posted by qtiger
So what you're saying is that it's better to violate the rights of the people and avoid the due process of law because if we don't a terrorist attack might occur?
Now then... which country will you be protecting with this strategy? Because it won't be the United States of America when we're done implimenting this policy. More like the United States of East Germany. Someone call the Stasi.
Don't be so dramatic. I will ask this question again as noone seems to be able to provide any credible answer to it based on fact. Which US citizen's rights have been violated by listening to the calls that are either to or from Al Qaeda?
What I am saying is that if Al Qaeda calls you, or you call Al Qaeda our government should know about with or without a warrant. If you are in collusion with our enemies then we need to know about it.
Am I to understand that you would prevent our government from acting against a possible terrorist and increasing the likelyhood of American deaths all to adhere to a process that is protecting the very individual that wants to harm America?