Originally Posted by benjamin
FISA wiretap warrants are basically rubber stamps, which I have a problem with all by itself, but at least a court is there to keep watch on the watchers. Those warrants can even be issued retroactively, so the idea that Bush had to authorize warrantless wiretaps or risk not gathering intelligence is just plain wrong.
There are ways to police the nation and monitor threats that don't involve violating the constitution. I choose freedom AND security; you apprently only think that both those things are necessary for Iraqis but not Americans.
Again there is absolutely nothing that has been done to violate any American under the Constitution. You are choosing freedom but not security. Without security there is not freedom.
You also forgot to answer my question.