Originally Posted by reno96teg
don't underestimate this one... the DS is doing better than the PSP, when the PSP is technologically superior in many ways.
we'll see though. there are a ton of PS fanboys.
in my opinion, nintendo's consoles stay true to what i think a console is supposed to be, so i hope to see this thing blow the PS3 and 360 out of the water.
correct #1
Originally Posted by umop-apisdn
It is? I guess that might explain why I have never seen a DS outside of a store. Oh wait, huh?
What's the best game out for the DS? Animal Crossing, Nintendogs? :rofl: I did have a slight penchant for the Advance Wars series awhile back, but even then, the whole game looked like a cartoon.
Oh, and Burnout looks like shit on the DS. Nintendo made me a PSP fanboy, not Sony.
look down. i've seen many more kids with DS than kids and adults with psp
Originally Posted by TeggerLS
If it's not taking advantage of my HDTV I don't want it, I don't care if it has a revolutionary controller if it has old graphics, I want to see the hairs on the back of my characters neck stand up when they're scared, I wanna see their pupils dialate. I'm sure the other systems could figure out a way to make these "interactive controllers" for their systems, and if the graphics are better y do I want to play a game that is superior playing but inferior looking? Games are just as VISUAL as they are INTERACTIVE. I see this as nintendo not being able to match the graphical capabilities of the 360 and PS3, so they came up with gimmick to sell the new system. A+ for the idea, F for not upgrading 100%.
you are playing video games for the wrong reasons
Originally Posted by sherwood
visuals are skin deep. games that dont revolve around creating an enviroment, such as sports games, wont have much to gain from furthering graphics past that of this generation coming up.
again, this generation graphics are still a major concern.
in the next generation, they will merely be a side effect of the evolutionary process
see above
Originally Posted by umop-apisdn
Yea, 'Teg has a point. Why waste all the manpower on a controller? The GC came out in '01, and their next gen system has a few more megs of RAM and a spiffy controller?
I just hope that N is trying to keep the price point to under $150 or that the info that Grifter posted is just smoke and mirrors.
more info will be posted as i come across it
Originally Posted by TeggerLS
I agree, but Nintendo should be pushing graphics just as much as gameply, it would make the system a double threat. I think they're afraid the system is gonna flop and they want to lighten their losses.
If the controller works the way they want great, but I wonder what kind of glitches may arise.
Might as well include a sensory suit so we can really "jump" into the game
again, the wrong reasons
out of the previous generation of consoles i only bought the gc for zelda and metroid. i have a psp but i am playing snes and genesis games on it
Originally Posted by Black2KGSR
I <3 Nintendo.
sums up the point of this thread