View Single Post
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 09:50 AM
  #9  
Wow Civic's Avatar
Wow Civic
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Default

Okay, Benjamin. The ACLU regularily threatens to file lawsuits against U.S. Government for this so-called "torture." The U.S. follows the Geneva Convention strictly. Is "torture" when an interrogator breaks down a terrorist suspect psychologically to retrieve information from the enemy? Yes, actually, the U.S. is critisized for that. Even if an interrogator contradicts Islam in front of a Muslim suspect -- torture. Now what kind of double standard is the ACLU following when they cry out "TORTURE" when our interrogators break a suspect down psychologically, but when video-tapes come out of the enemy decapitating or executing an American the ACLU is silent? Our soldiers were wrong for putting taping wires on a terrorist and telling him if he stepped off the bucket he would be zapped (even though there was no electricity in those wires) Yes it was wrong. But it was in an area that if a terrorist did that to a hostage on video-tape we would all be saying "Oh, thank God, he's not killing him." We would be THANKFUL if a terrorist did that to a hostage. Terrorists don't give their hostages trials. They decapitate, execute, and abuse. Okay, obviously I've proved that the ACLU is not patriotic. But why must they be anti-American?

We live in a world where our own military charges our soldiers with murder and assault IN A WAR. The enemy has no rules or morales. They will kill and kill all in the name of this non-existent "Allah." Should we blame these poor misguided fools though? Maybe they are brainwashed into violence. After all, have you ever read phrases from the Qu'ran? If you have you would swear you were reading a Charles Manson rant.

The point is is ACLU's policy is extremely Anti-American. They do not speak out when our soldiers and innocent civilians are kidnapped by a ruthless Muslim and decapitated, mutilated, or executed. They do, however, speak out when some guy was supposedly "racially profiled" in a NYC subway by a random search. I could go on and on about racial profiling and how it would actually benefit rooting out terrorists, but I have a feeling you would deem that "outrageous" and "unlawful!!" After all, would you, as a police officer, stop a middle-eastern man that has wires sticking out of his backpack, or a 4 year old girl on her way to Grandma's house?
Reply