View Single Post
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 04:12 AM
  #36  
Bl@ck's Avatar
Bl@ck
Sinner
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,599
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Default

Originally Posted by benjamin
You're wrong because you fail to define "undermine." You think that publicly disagreeing and criticizing the President undermines him and therefore the government and is thus treasonous. Fortunately for those of us who enjoy exercising our freedom of speech, the law doesn't allow subjective, vague criteria to decide who is guilty of treason.

I am forced to ask: how does my saying "Impeach that criminal Bush" put the troops in greater danger? (This is a rhetorical question. The answer is, obviously, that it doesn't.)
I have defined "undermine". you failed to read it:goodjob:criticism is one thing. knowingly and willingly publishing an article based on unconfirmable information with the intent to outrage the musim population of the world is another. please stop typing when you know not of which you speak.
Reply