Originally Posted by Anthony
if i were the supreme court i wouldn't hear this case either. too much of a case that would lead to future precedences.
Anyways, the Supreme Court would have no need. There's no obstruction of justice, the law has been clearly and repeatedly defined in the lower courts, and this is no longer a legal matter, but purely a political issue. Simple as that, and I can decide why they don't want to dirty their hands in it, especially since they've turned them down multiple times before.