Originally Posted by ISP James
and what orginization of any esteem (Hamilton prides themselves on being top crust) would facilitate such opinion?
i dont think that this is a discussion of the 1st amendment. i think it is a discussion of horrible judgement on the part of Hamilton when they decided to invite this guy and give him an auditorium, a microphone, and a croud to listen to his absurd views.
but see it is a verbal and or writen binding contract to a promise to have him be there. they can pull out of that contract easily, but they are the ones that brought his right to have an opinion to the fight.
they are the ones who booked him and then canceled him, the only reason being his opinon, and therefor they are opressing his opinon, the surely are able to facilitate him