Originally Posted by dubster99
No, Mike has made it clear that he doesnt think there is widespread abuse of the programs.
You're right, I don't.
What do you define as widespread?
Let's say there's a 100:1 ratio of legitimate beneficiaries to abusers. Is that widespread?
50:1? 10:1? Where do you draw the line?
I can't imagine there is a large enough proportion of people abusing the system to negate its benefits to the people who are legitimately on whatever programs.
Until someone provides some numbers to the contrary, I will continue in that belief.