Originally Posted by twin3037
actaully the nsx was only 1 second slower around laguna seca then a z06, these are stock cars, whihc 1 sec isn't much when the zo6 completlly kills it on the straights that proves the nsx's handeling abillity even with a 1989 design.
1 second on a road course is a pretty big deal. You've probably never taken a car you owned on any sort of road course so I guess you'd think 1 second isn't a big deal. I'm not arguing the NSX isn't a great handling car, but as a whole package PERFORMANCE wise it doesn't stack up to a Z06.
g2tegls, you're an even bigger fanboy if you want to compare a NSX to a ferrari 360 and ESPECIALLY by saying "ACCORDING TO MAGAZINE TIMES" Jesus Christ, I highly doubt you've driven a NSX much less SAT IN a 360. I've driven both and I can tell you they're worlds apart. It's like comparing your 12 year old 2nd gen integra LS to a JDM DC5 type R. Even NSX owners admit the Z06 has better performance hands down, how much more evidence do you need?