Originally Posted by Jkan2001
Funny, a stock Z06 slaloms at a higher speed, lateral skidpads over 1G and has shorter stopping distances so i guess that means it has more sheer straight line speed AND better handling right?
People buy NSX's for the hand built quality and exclusivity as well as just having a fun all around car. Sure the NSX is aluminum frame but the vette is fiberglass also not some sheet metal tank like everyone wants to think. In the end in terms of pure performance a Z06 will still tear it a new one in every aspect. Now quit being another honda fanboy like half the people on this board and give props where they are due.
FYI i drove a turbo civic before as you probably know so i'm every bit as partial to honda but the facts don't lie. Either way, you will never own either car so you probably shouldn't worry.
:woopdee****indoo:
There are many reasons to buy an NSX over a 'Vette and many to buy a 'Vette over an NSX. But it would be ignorant to say a Z06 is a better car because it has a .2 sec faster quarter mile time or because it can go around a cone .1 mph faster. This arguement is as old as the NSX itself. I'm not a typical Honda fanboy as you call it, and I give respect where it is due. The Z06 is a great performer at almost half the price of an NSX. But it's still not an NSX. Whether the Acura is worth the cost is up to the buyer.