View Single Post
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 06:33 PM
  #49  
fastball's Avatar
fastball
A little chin music
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio - Rock 'n Roll capitol of the World
Default

Originally posted by 90TGP
You're funny

GM did exactly that, back in the early 90s with a Corvette called the ZR1. This Vette was produced from 1990-1995.

Motor Specs:
The ZR-1 engine or LT5 was an all aluminum block and cylinder heads, 4 overhead camshafts, 32 valves 350 cu. inches V8. The HP rating was 375hp at 370 ft lbs of torque from 1990-1992 and 405hp at 385 ft lbs of torque from 1993-1995. Designed by GM and Lotus. Came with a 6-speed transmission.

The reason why they stopped production of the LT5 motor was because sales were low and it would cost more money to redesign teh LT5 motor since the C5 Corvette was only two years away.

Here's the Complete specification of a ZR1 Corvette.
http://www.zr1.net/ZR1_specs.html

Picture of the LT5 motor.


1995 Corvette ZR1


P.S. Know the facts before you run your mouth.
That engine was not developed completely in house, as you said it proved too costly make a long run at it, and consequently never made a long run at it. I had the ZR1 in mind, but it was too rare and short lived to say that GM had success with it. Like I did say, if you read my post, the car would cost 30k more than a standard Vette and no one would go for that. Also, Honda had VTEC long before Chevy even considered producing the ZR1, so to even consider a ZR1 cutting edge technology would not be true. Yes, it was very cutting edge, compared to any other domestic at the time. And even to an extent advanced for domestics today. It just shows how far they are behind. The rest of the world is getting same performance with half the displacement, twice the fuel economy, and 3 times the reliability. That's engineering.