I would kill to preserve myself or those close to me.

But now think about this:
Would anything change if you could kill without legal reprecussions?

 

I don't believe in violence unless you put either my family, my friends or my life in danger.

 

REminds me of what I've heard a few old guys say:
As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I shall fear no evil, cause I am the meanest son of a bitch in the valley. :thumbup:

 

no.

 

:nervous:

Since for me, killing someone isn't a premeditated thing, it's hard to say what/who I'd kill for. All I know is that my son is the most important person to me in this world and I would not hesitate to protect him at all costs

 

No legal repurcussions? Hell yeah that'd change things. I'd have shot and killed those bastards that stole my civic.

 

many people say they'd kill without hesitation, you must be programmed like a robot. That's freaking hard to do.

I'd prolly only hurt someone until they stop moving, so aim for the lower body.

I'd prolly only "immobilize" some if they attack me or family

 

I've never tried to kill someone so I have no idea how hard it would be. All I know is that if I am that mad/threatened, im aiming for the head/chest not the leg/extremeties. At that point, im not caring about anyone/thing but me and mine.

 

Everyone is assuming they have a gun and that is not always the case. What if you had to sneak up behind someone and kill them with a rope or a pipe. Could you not do that? Would you have to do it to their face? Barehands, blugening(sp?) object, spearing tool, cutting tool? A gun makes it very clean and easy.

 

yeah well i couldnt take someone's life like that....it's much easier for me to shoot and not have the experience of seeing someone dying from head and chest wounds. Thats why some vietnam vets are sick.


when i buy a gun, i'll be applying for the class that lets me get my conceilment permit