is anyone considering cr-z?
Thread Starter
bow down to king puffy
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,694
Likes: 0
http://cr-z.honda.com/specifications/
problem I have is weight. 2600 is too much for 122hp car. It's no crx for sure.
problem I have is weight. 2600 is too much for 122hp car. It's no crx for sure.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,152
Likes: 0
From: Golden, CO
The CRZ really doesn't make any sense to me. It's too slow to be a "pocket rocket," (0-60 in 10.5 seconds) and it gets only 33mpg.
As a sports coupe, the Civic SI is way better. About the same price, waaaay faster (0-60 in 6.7 seconds), similar interior space (+2 more mostly useable seats), though it does get worse mileage (24 mpg combined).
As an eco car, the Civic hybrid is way better. About the same price, gets better mileage (42mpg) and has way more interior space, though it is a bit slower (13.5 seconds 0-60).
Seems like they tried to find a midpoint between these 2 vehicles, but it ends up being too slow and not efficient enough. I do like the styling, but the car just seems misplaced.
As a sports coupe, the Civic SI is way better. About the same price, waaaay faster (0-60 in 6.7 seconds), similar interior space (+2 more mostly useable seats), though it does get worse mileage (24 mpg combined).
As an eco car, the Civic hybrid is way better. About the same price, gets better mileage (42mpg) and has way more interior space, though it is a bit slower (13.5 seconds 0-60).
Seems like they tried to find a midpoint between these 2 vehicles, but it ends up being too slow and not efficient enough. I do like the styling, but the car just seems misplaced.
Come in My Hole
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 27,444
Likes: 0
The CRZ really doesn't make any sense to me. It's too slow to be a "pocket rocket," (0-60 in 10.5 seconds) and it gets only 33mpg.
As a sports coupe, the Civic SI is way better. About the same price, waaaay faster (0-60 in 6.7 seconds), similar interior space (+2 more mostly useable seats), though it does get worse mileage (24 mpg combined).
As an eco car, the Civic hybrid is way better. About the same price, gets better mileage (42mpg) and has way more interior space, though it is a bit slower (13.5 seconds 0-60).
Seems like they tried to find a midpoint between these 2 vehicles, but it ends up being too slow and not efficient enough. I do like the styling, but the car just seems misplaced.
As a sports coupe, the Civic SI is way better. About the same price, waaaay faster (0-60 in 6.7 seconds), similar interior space (+2 more mostly useable seats), though it does get worse mileage (24 mpg combined).
As an eco car, the Civic hybrid is way better. About the same price, gets better mileage (42mpg) and has way more interior space, though it is a bit slower (13.5 seconds 0-60).
Seems like they tried to find a midpoint between these 2 vehicles, but it ends up being too slow and not efficient enough. I do like the styling, but the car just seems misplaced.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 10,168
Likes: 4
From: New Orleans
The CRZ really doesn't make any sense to me. It's too slow to be a "pocket rocket," (0-60 in 10.5 seconds) and it gets only 33mpg.
As a sports coupe, the Civic SI is way better. About the same price, waaaay faster (0-60 in 6.7 seconds), similar interior space (+2 more mostly useable seats), though it does get worse mileage (24 mpg combined).
As an eco car, the Civic hybrid is way better. About the same price, gets better mileage (42mpg) and has way more interior space, though it is a bit slower (13.5 seconds 0-60).
Seems like they tried to find a midpoint between these 2 vehicles, but it ends up being too slow and not efficient enough. I do like the styling, but the car just seems misplaced.
As a sports coupe, the Civic SI is way better. About the same price, waaaay faster (0-60 in 6.7 seconds), similar interior space (+2 more mostly useable seats), though it does get worse mileage (24 mpg combined).
As an eco car, the Civic hybrid is way better. About the same price, gets better mileage (42mpg) and has way more interior space, though it is a bit slower (13.5 seconds 0-60).
Seems like they tried to find a midpoint between these 2 vehicles, but it ends up being too slow and not efficient enough. I do like the styling, but the car just seems misplaced.
How in god's name can they call anything that is above 10 seconds in 0-60 a sports car? :eh: