+1. I've been happy with the Mach 3/Mach 3 turbo so I just stick with those. h:

 

And I'm sure this new razor will be $$$$$$$$$$$$$ and the disposable cartridges will be 2x the cost of the already overpriced Mach3 blades.

 

no, not really.

 

Thinner blades = shorter live = more expensive per shave. A mach 3 lasts me months shaving almost ever day. A fusion lasted me maybe a week, and I suspect this will last days at most.

 

got my free razor in.

dude its the vibrating one with the battery too! i always wondered how those felt.

on another note, these new razor shits work freagn smooth. i was uber surprised. i'm a skeptic and have been changed. plus a 3 dollar coupon that will become 6 dollars with double coupons. win.

 

Ehh it's the same shit coming up with some new gimmick to lock you in to ever-more-expensive refill cartridges. One of those Fusion refills costs like 8 cents to make and they sell em for about $3.35 each. $36 Costco 20-packs of Mach 3 Turbo refills FTW.

I got a fancy schmancy Panasonic ultrasonic titanium wet/dry electric shaver a few months ago, and when I ran out of Mach 3 refills I actually held out for a few weeks before buying more. But even the uber gizmo electric only approaches the shave quality of a decent razor if I spend way too much time going over the rough spots with the electric.

I'd consider going down to a 2-blade refill if it were actually cheaper but I don't think Costco has the Gillette Sensor refills so they end up costing more than the Mach 3.

 

Doesn't this new razor use the same attachment as the Fusion?

 

 

got it today

 

yes


also, shaved 1/2 with fusion and 1/2 with the new one.. no real noticeable difference. i shall use my fusion heads on it though, since its shiny o: