it's organized nations. Freedom to put it bluntly...

 

Iraq and Iran have had more stable leadership than the United States. We have policy changes every time elections get close.

 

OK I am going to ask a general question and want a decent answer (doubt I will get it though).

What qualifies a country as an "organized country" that can have nuke capacity?

Is it a specific format we are looking at or just a random dart on a map theory?

 

We don't stone women in the streets, we don't shoot athletes because they didn't score, we don't shoot a man dead because he doesn't pay taxes.

they are organized......SURE! But only the few have any say in it.

 

Freedom compared to what? If it has never been experienced then what makes you so sure you would want it??

 

Nah nah we just have to keep the "axis of evil" from having nuclear weapons. The Superfriends will help us, but we will have to fight the Legion of Doom, who will undoubtedly use the nuclear weapons in nefarious plots.

So only democratic countries can have nuclear weapons?

 

Statistacly our system works. The MAJORITY of people in this nation are happy with their rights and freedoms. Sure a few people get screwed, but other party had a higher ranking of rights in that particular situation. Im happy with that and I think that eveyone is entitled to equal rights...

 

Yes, and the Third Reich was the most efficient government of all time.

 

So because you see it as a better system everyone has to go by the same system?

Their monarchies and rulership styles have been around many times longer than democracy has but suddenly its not good enough?? I don't know about peoples thought processes anymore because that doesn't make much sense to me.

I agree that threats need to be minimized but you can't call it a threat just because it looks or acts differently than you would or do.

 

Communism is theoretically the most efficient and effective government....regardless we've proven that this is a democracy....a government of the people and for the people.