Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

San Diego @ night

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 09:45 AM
  #1  
jaymar88's Avatar
jaymar88
Thread Starter
HA.net Workout Krew
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,039
Likes: 0
From: In the gym
Default San Diego @ night

Just posted a few pics I took last night.

https://www.honda-acura.net/forums/p...ml#post4407809




Reply
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #2  
DarkStarr's Avatar
DarkStarr
Shake n Bake!
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,794
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

haha looks nicer than pittsburgh did last night
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 09:58 AM
  #3  
k3ifers's Avatar
k3ifers
k three ifers
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,568
Likes: 4
From: Buffalo, NY
Default

looks better than cuse too.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 10:00 AM
  #4  
Draconius's Avatar
Draconius
BAZINGA!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,613
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Too bad you didn't get any during the fireworks over Qualcomm
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 10:01 AM
  #5  
JoePoonani's Avatar
JoePoonani
Lexus Tech y0!!
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,321
Likes: 1
From: CT
Default

How the hell did you take such vivid pictures? Did you even have enough light?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 10:03 AM
  #6  
Draconius's Avatar
Draconius
BAZINGA!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,613
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by JoePoonani
How the hell did you take such vivid pictures? Did you even have enough light?
Have a long exposure. I would guess he did upwards to 20 second exposure on these.

You can also hold the bulb open for as long as you want.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 10:06 AM
  #7  
jaymar88's Avatar
jaymar88
Thread Starter
HA.net Workout Krew
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,039
Likes: 0
From: In the gym
Default

Originally Posted by Draconius
Have a long exposure. I would guess he did upwards to 20 second exposure on these.

You can also hold the bulb open for as long as you want.

Nope. I think I had these at about 8-13 secs @ ISO 100 F8-11
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 10:08 AM
  #8  
JoePoonani's Avatar
JoePoonani
Lexus Tech y0!!
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,321
Likes: 1
From: CT
Default

Originally Posted by jaymar88
Nope. I think I had these at about 8-13 secs @ ISO 100 F8-11
So the longer exposure takes in more light right?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 10:09 AM
  #9  
Draconius's Avatar
Draconius
BAZINGA!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,613
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

^^
Yup. Leaves the film exposed so more light hits it over time. Night shots with stars are high numbers, and galaxy images can be open exposure for hours and hours.

Copy that. There is a lot of light pollution in San Diego so I guess 8-13 was a good number
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 10:10 AM
  #10  
jaymar88's Avatar
jaymar88
Thread Starter
HA.net Workout Krew
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,039
Likes: 0
From: In the gym
Default

Originally Posted by Draconius
^^

Copy that. There is a lot of light pollution in San Diego so I guess 8-13 was a good number
LOL just giving you shit Bri!!! hahaha. Yeah lots of light pollution and cloud cover = grey tones. Sodium lighting is also tough to correct. I had a bitch of a time trying to the the WB correct.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:58 PM.