Glad someone is setting the record straight
Well, the end justify the means.. right? So it doesn't matter that we lie to people and make it mandatory that all school age kids watch our propaganda. Were just trying to reduce pollution.
Everyone who actually does there own research is obviously mistaken. Along with all the facts, don't look at those, i'm sure it's bad for the environment. :tsk:
Everyone who actually does there own research is obviously mistaken. Along with all the facts, don't look at those, i'm sure it's bad for the environment. :tsk:
Well, the end justify the means.. right? So it doesn't matter that we lie to people and make it mandatory that all school age kids watch our propaganda. Were just trying to reduce pollution.
Everyone who actually does there own research is obviously mistaken. Along with all the facts, don't look at those, i'm sure it's bad for the environment. :tsk:
Everyone who actually does there own research is obviously mistaken. Along with all the facts, don't look at those, i'm sure it's bad for the environment. :tsk:
This thread is still going? o:
__________________
2015 Ford Mustang GT Fastback - Ingot Silver - 6M - Performance Package - Gibson Catback, JLT CAI, FR 47lb injectors, BAMA E85 tune, Eibach Sportline, BMR wheel hop kit, UPR oil separator, Steeda shifter bushing/bracket
Team B.O.B.® - Ballaz on a Budget
2015 Ford Mustang GT Fastback - Ingot Silver - 6M - Performance Package - Gibson Catback, JLT CAI, FR 47lb injectors, BAMA E85 tune, Eibach Sportline, BMR wheel hop kit, UPR oil separator, Steeda shifter bushing/bracket
Team B.O.B.® - Ballaz on a Budget
See, here's the amazing thing: We don't have to ruin our economy. Improved efficiencies means improved cost savings. Finding better ways to ship, package, and produce products provide significant, long term, increasing cost savings. They provide positive green marketing. Smart production can allow for greater unit production per amount of resource.
i couldn't find the articles covering this when i posted that, but i will try again.
found some of them:
Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979: http://www.dailytech.com/Article.aspx?newsid=13834
raw data underneath that: http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/
and NASA kookiness: http://www.heartland.org/publication...rticleid=24359
Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979: http://www.dailytech.com/Article.aspx?newsid=13834
raw data underneath that: http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/
and NASA kookiness: http://www.heartland.org/publication...rticleid=24359
found some of them:
Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979: http://www.dailytech.com/Article.aspx?newsid=13834
raw data underneath that: http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/
and NASA kookiness: http://www.heartland.org/publication...rticleid=24359
Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979: http://www.dailytech.com/Article.aspx?newsid=13834
raw data underneath that: http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/
and NASA kookiness: http://www.heartland.org/publication...rticleid=24359
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php...and-molehills/


