women with tat's.
Jul 28, 2008 | 07:28 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,992
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
in for full size tats :naughty:
Jul 28, 2008 | 07:31 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 36,124
Likes: 0
From: the best coast
never nice
__________________
no sig
Jul 28, 2008 | 07:43 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 20,749
Likes: 0
From: NJ
As long as they're not cheap and nicely placed, women with tats > women without.
:yumyum:
But some can turn out to be totaly trashy looking.
Jul 28, 2008 | 07:44 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,639
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh/Columbus
i like. i feel like a tatted up girl goes for a certain kinda guy, though, and i doubt my fratastic ass fits the bill
h:
Jul 28, 2008 | 07:47 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,619
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jersey
Lower back = something to aim at :naughty:
Jul 28, 2008 | 07:59 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,562
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
yeah, it definately depends on the girl, her demeanor, placement, body & tat subject & quality......
my friend alexis has a pretty cool large arm tat
Jul 28, 2008 | 10:30 AM
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 14,544
Likes: 0
From: Holyoke, MA
i dont mind women with tats, as long as its not a tramp stamp. the one i posted was a link my friend gave me. she alright. i dont know if i could hit it. i would have to see her tat's up close.
Jul 28, 2008 | 10:32 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 30,331
Likes: 0
From: Montréal, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James3370
yeah, it definately depends on the girl, her demeanor, placement, body & tat subject & quality......
my friend alexis has a pretty cool large arm tat
i'd fuck her...
Jul 28, 2008 | 10:55 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,421
Likes: 0
From: san diego
nothing wrong with a little ink
Jul 28, 2008 | 11:04 AM
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 14,544
Likes: 0
From: Holyoke, MA