Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Bill Gates chews out Microsoft

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 07:36 AM
  #1  
thomas's Avatar
thomas
Thread Starter
pew pew pew
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,437
Likes: 0
From: teh az
Default Bill Gates chews out Microsoft

http://gizmodo.com/5019516/classic-c...rosoft-over-xp


this is a leaked email from bill gates and it makes me feel better about issues with windows

From: Bill Gates
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:05 AM
To: Jim Allchin
Cc: Chris Jones (WINDOWS); Bharat Shah (NT); Joe Peterson; Will Poole; Brian Valentine; Anoop Gupta (RESEARCH)
Subject: Windows Usability Systematic degradation flame

I am quite disappointed at how Windows Usability has been going backwards and the program management groups don't drive usability issues.

Let me give you my experience from yesterday.

I decided to download (Moviemaker) and buy the Digital Plus pack ... so I went to Microsoft.com. They have a download place so I went there.

The first 5 times I used the site it timed out while trying to bring up the download page. Then after an 8 second delay I got it to come up.

This site is so slow it is unusable.

It wasn't in the top 5 so I expanded the other 45.

These 45 names are totally confusing. These names make stuff like: C:\Documents and Settings\billg\My Documents\My Pictures seem clear.

They are not filtered by the system ... and so many of the things are strange.

I tried scoping to Media stuff. Still no moviemaker. I typed in movie. Nothing. I typed in movie maker. Nothing.

So I gave up and sent mail to Amir saying - where is this Moviemaker download? Does it exist?

So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated.

They told me to go to the main page search button and type movie maker (not moviemaker!).

I tried that. The site was pathetically slow but after 6 seconds of waiting up it came.

I thought for sure now I would see a button to just go do the download.

In fact it is more like a puzzle that you get to solve. It told me to go to Windows Update and do a bunch of incantations.

This struck me as completely odd. Why should I have to go somewhere else and do a scan to download moviemaker?

So I went to Windows update. Windows Update decides I need to download a bunch of controls. (Not) just once but multiple times where I get to see weird dialog boxes.

Doesn't Windows update know some key to talk to Windows?

Then I did the scan. This took quite some time and I was told it was critical for me to download 17megs of stuff.

This is after I was told we were doing delta patches to things but instead just to get 6 things that are labeled in the SCARIEST possible way I had to download 17meg.

So I did the download. That part was fast. Then it wanted to do an install. This took 6 minutes and the machine was so slow I couldn't use it for anything else during this time.

What the heck is going on during those 6 minutes? That is crazy. This is after the download was finished.

Then it told me to reboot my machine. Why should I do that? I reboot every night — why should I reboot at that time?

So I did the reboot because it INSISTED on it. Of course that meant completely getting rid of all my Outlook state.

So I got back up and running and went to Windows Updale again. I forgot why I was in Windows Update at all since all I wanted was to get Moviemaker.

So I went back to Microsoft.com and looked at the instructions. I have to click on a folder called WindowsXP. Why should I do that? Windows Update knows I am on Windows XP.

What does it mean to have to click on that folder? So I get a bunch of confusing stuff but sure enough one of them is Moviemaker.

So I do the download. The download is fast but the Install takes many minutes. Amazing how slow this thing is.

At some point I get told I need to go get Windows Media Series 9 to download.

So I decide I will go do that. This time I get dialogs saying things like "Open" or "Save". No guidance in the instructions which to do. I have no clue which to do.

The download is fast and the install takes 7 minutes for this thing.

So now I think I am going to have Moviemaker. I go to my add/remove programs place to make sure it is there.

It is not there.

What is there? The following garbage is there. Microsoft Autoupdate Exclusive test package, Microsoft Autoupdate Reboot test package, Microsoft Autoupdate testpackage1. Microsoft AUtoupdate testpackage2, Microsoft Autoupdate Test package3.

Someone decided to trash the one part of Windows that was usable? The file system is no longer usable. The registry is not usable. This program listing was one sane place but now it is all crapped up.

But that is just the start of the crap. Later I have listed things like Windows XP Hotfix see Q329048 for more information. What is Q329048? Why are these series of patches listed here? Some of the patches just things like Q810655 instead of saying see Q329048 for more information.

What an absolute mess.

Moviemaker is just not there at all.

So I give up on Moviemaker and decide to download the Digital Plus Package.

I get told I need to go enter a bunch of information about myself.

I enter it all in and because it decides I have mistyped something I have to try again. Of course it has cleared out most of what I typed.

I try (typing) the right stuff in 5 times and it just keeps clearing things out for me to type them in again.

So after more than an hour of craziness and making my programs list garbage and being scared and seeing that Microsoft.com is a terrible website I haven't run Moviemaker and I haven't got the plus package.

The lack of attention to usability represented by these experiences blows my mind. I thought we had reached a low with Windows Network places or the messages I get when I try to use 802.11. (don't you just love that root certificate message?)

When I really get to use the stuff I am sure I will have more feedback.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 07:40 AM
  #2  
e3NiNe's Avatar
e3NiNe
#CustomUserTitle
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 63,855
Likes: 1
From: glass case of emotion
Default

This is what happens when people devalue site usability studies and appropriate IT quality assurance.

If the email is legit ... ooooouuuch.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 07:44 AM
  #3  
ShaolinLueb's Avatar
ShaolinLueb
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 14,544
Likes: 0
From: Holyoke, MA
Default

wow. he should switch to ibook
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 07:46 AM
  #4  
e3NiNe's Avatar
e3NiNe
#CustomUserTitle
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 63,855
Likes: 1
From: glass case of emotion
Default

Don't get me started about the freaky bugs n shit i find in iTunes and Quicktime.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 07:47 AM
  #5  
RicoD's Avatar
RicoD
Pull my finger
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 41,423
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

If the email is legit, only these people could have "leaked" it
Jim Allchin, Chris Jones (WINDOWS); Bharat Shah (NT); Joe Peterson; Will Poole; Brian Valentine; Anoop Gupta (RESEARCH
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 07:53 AM
  #6  
HawtPants's Avatar
HawtPants
the one and only
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 15,571
Likes: 0
From: Govenator Territory
Default

i find that openware stuff is usually the best. sourceforge
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 07:59 AM
  #7  
ShaolinLueb's Avatar
ShaolinLueb
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 14,544
Likes: 0
From: Holyoke, MA
Default

Originally Posted by e3NiNe
Don't get me started about the freaky bugs n shit i find in iTunes and Quicktime.
dont get me started how macs put server quality stuff in their computers and say this is better then pc's who dont use server quality products in their pc's. so its an obvious reason while 1 is better then the other. of course server stuff is better, :duh:
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 08:06 AM
  #8  
RicoD's Avatar
RicoD
Pull my finger
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 41,423
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

no more 3rd parties
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 08:06 AM
  #9  
thomas's Avatar
thomas
Thread Starter
pew pew pew
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,437
Likes: 0
From: teh az
Default

Originally Posted by RicoD
If the email is legit, only these people could have "leaked" it
Jim Allchin, Chris Jones (WINDOWS); Bharat Shah (NT); Joe Peterson; Will Poole; Brian Valentine; Anoop Gupta (RESEARCH
not nessisarly it could have been forwarded
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 08:09 AM
  #10  
spanky's Avatar
spanky
I go duffy on dem bitches
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 28,248
Likes: 0
From: Gonzales, Louisiana
Default

sounds made up
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:00 AM.