When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
if every car ( i mean ever car) burned hydrogen as a fuel source, and the only thing that came out your tail pipe was water vapor, wouldnt that mean that it would always rain? thats a lot of vapor in the air. it would always be humid. No?
It would be very little water that goes back into the atmosphere. There's a boatload of energy in a cup of water, the hard thing is splitting the water molecule.
if every car ( i mean ever car) burned hydrogen as a fuel source, and the only thing that came out your tail pipe was water vapor, wouldnt that mean that it would always rain? thats a lot of vapor in the air. it would always be humid. No?
True, and we'd have a catch can device on our roof to constantly refill our tanks. Unlimited mileage FTW!!11111~
great, but how much energy does it take to run the RF generator in order to burn the water? if theres little to no net yield of energy, its not too useful
+1 - its the ratio of produced:used thats important.
this doen't really make sense with conservation of energy laws. If the RF waves are the only added energy to the system, and if you start and end with H2O the heat generated HAS to be less than or equal than the energy input through the RF waves. Why do people keep thinking you can create energy without consuming anything?