http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science....ap/index.html



http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/07/28/gen....ap/index.html

 

There were some people talking about that in the DMV yesterday.

 

ya wonder how they can bring charges against the people ...

its not their fault. its the machine / banks fault

granted they didnt report it, but its clerical error, i dont believe they would be held by law to report it

 

I was wondering the same thing although you can rest assured that the issuing bank will probably correct the credits from the associated accounts.

 

Well...considering how it was unplugged by the owner of the truck stop, and then plugged back in, that is where the problem lies

 

They unplugged it because it was doing it, someone else plugged it back in.

 

that doesnt mean they can prosecute people who were simply using the machine.

your telling me if the machine you extra cash you would report it? i wouldnt say aword until someone came to me and asked about it

 

good ethics there dude.

 

I'm black......you know my answer. But no what i'm getting at is apparently there were several people who probably knew that this machine gave extra money and used the machine. So the owners found out and took the machine offline...perfectly understandable. But for someone to go and plug it back in, knowing they could get more monies. That's where i constitute it as stealing.

 

the first person that got more than they punched in was stealing.

i'd fire the fucker that loaded the cash into that machine fo sho