When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I thought I remembered seeing something about the cloth sheet he was wrapped in for burial after his crucifixion. I never investigated the matter so I'm uncertain of its validity.
I thought I remembered seeing something about the cloth sheet he was wrapped in for burial after his crucifixion. I never investigated the matter so I'm uncertain of its validity.
They did find one that dated back to his time and was near the crucifixion spot, but they still could'nt link it jesus. I cant find anything only claims.:shrug:
They did find one that dated back to his time and was near the crucifixion spot, but they still could'nt link it jesus. I cant find anything only claims.:shrug:
incorrect....scientific inquiry found that it was made sometime in the 1400-1500's...and to take it one step further artists have examined it and found that the front and make are not proportional (therefore making it impossible to have the image of a real person) and that the part for the face/head was 2 dimensional so it would look correct on a piece of cloth (if it were three dimensional it would look stretched out on a 2 dimensional piece of cloth...much how the earth looks round on a globe but elongated on a map).
It's hard to find scientific data from around 2000 years ago on a person. Well the scientific data you want, there are many records of his existence and that should serve as enough, his miracles may be what are exaggerated or not exist if you want scientific proof but having the amount of followers he did proves that he did "scientifically" exist.
It's hard to find scientific data from around 2000 years ago on a person. Well the scientific data you want, there are many records of his existence and that should serve as enough, his miracles may be what are exaggerated or not exist if you want scientific proof but having the amount of followers he did proves that he did "scientifically" exist.
No that doesn't scientifically prove anything...there are a lot of people that believe that Tupac and Elvis are still alive...people even come forward saying they saw him. Simply having a lot of people believing in something does not provide proof of it's existence. As for these records that you are referring to that may be exactly what I am looking for if you can link me to these records.
Maybe I should clarify...by "Real" proof I mean archaeological evidence or reputable historical documents. There may be other types of scientific data that I would consider "real"...but I can't think of any.
Originally Posted by spankaveli
This is the wrong forum, then.
no, just the wrong thread...this isn't On Topic because it is not specifically about a current event