They are both VERY good cover corners. I'm not starting Housh in my other league...I'm starting Javon Walker and Marques Colston. I wouldn't play anybody going against the Denver defense. They're going to get pressure on Palmer, and have excellent coverage on their WR's.

Gonzales is a good TE, but the Raiders defense is pretty good. I would go with Holt, Coles, Colston...but think about Holt, Colston, Gonzales.

 

just because you haven't heard much about him doesn't mean he's not putting up decent numbers.

last week: 12 rec. 144yds, 1td
week before: 4 rec. 67yds, 1 td

 

i have to do 3 WRs and a TE (one of the WRs is a flex spot, but i don't have another good RB).

 

Ohhhhhhhhh ok. In that case:

WR's:

Holt, Coles, Colston

TE: Gonzales

 

i just wonder how much the chiefs are going to throw since they obviously liked to run it against the raiders last game. they threw it just 16 times last time.

 

True, the Raiders run defense is pretty bad...but running as much as they're going to will open up the passing game. If you want to start Housh in the flex spot, go for it...I'm just not expecting much out of him, and we only start 2 WR's and no TE's...so I benched him for Colston.

 

the thing about housh, he seems to do better against the tough defenses. maybe because the def is worried about chad.

oak : 8/118/1
bal : 10/106/1
cle* : 7/79/1

(*i know, not a great defense)

but that's what he did up until the indy game, where they ran way more than they should have. because of that, the could be throwing a lot more this week.


i don't know. i'm still on the fence.

 

Yeah but talking corners/secondary, Denver is possibly the best in the league. Champ Bailey and Darrent Williams are both insanely good, and John Lynch is a great safety. When Denver gives up passing TD's, it's generally to a TE that the linebackers can't cover.

 

get off the broncos secondary's sack :fawk:

 

i see what you're saying.