Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Officials mull firearm ordinance

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 01:45 PM
  #1  
Grifter's Avatar
Grifter
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 44,835
Likes: 0
From: the southwest
Default Officials mull firearm ordinance

By Daniel Lovering
The Associated Press

CHERRY TREE -- In this tiny community of clapboard houses nestled along the banks of a Pennsylvania river, many residents own guns for hunting or self-defense.

But a local councilman, inspired by steps taken by an Idaho town, proposed an ordinance that recommends all households keep weapons and ammunition to ward off would-be burglars and prevent crime from creeping into the area.

Council members in Cherry Tree, a borough of about 430 people, were set to meet Wednesday to discuss the Civil Protection Ordinance put forth by Henry Statkowski, a 59-year-old retired U.S. Army master sergeant and Vietnam veteran.

Talk of the proposal, which also seeks to offer firearm training at the borough hall, has elicited cautious support and bitter rebukes from residents, many of whom commute to jobs elsewhere.

Gun-control advocates say such a measure would risk putting guns into the hands of criminals and increase gun violence.

Statkowski maintains the ordinance would keep crime down -- "way down" -- in Cherry Tree, a quiet village where streets are marked with wooden signs and residents say crime is largely limited to drugs, vandalism, trespassing and speeding drivers.

"This is rural America," Statkowski said in a phone interview. "You want to break into someone's house here, you might not like the consequences."

The ordinance is meant to be a proactive measure to complement the borough's police force, which consists of a handful of part-time officers who also have day jobs, Statkowski said.

"They can't be everywhere," he said. "When you need help, you need it now."

Statkowski said he decided to float the idea after learning of a similar ordinance passed last month in Greenleaf, Idaho, a town of about 850 residents where an estimated 80 percent of adults already own guns.

That ordinance asks people in the pacifist Quaker-founded town who do not object on religious or other grounds to keep a gun at home in case they are overrun by refugees from disasters like Hurricane Katrina.

Based on an unenforced 1982 law in Kennesaw, Ga., Greenleaf's law originally required all homeowners to own and maintain a firearm. The town of Bowerbank, Maine, enacted a similar regulation 12 years ago.

The Cherry Tree measure would not be the first gun-related ordinance in Pennsylvania. In 1994, Franklintown repealed a law enacted 12 years earlier requiring each household to own a gun and ammunition.

Statkowski acknowledged that Cherry Tree, a one-time logging center about 70 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, does not have a crime problem.

"We don't want one," he said, citing a recent break-in 12 miles from the borough and a drug raid five miles away.

Gary Talerico, co-owner of a local insurance agency, said he saw no need for such a measure.

But Esther Long, 59, a retired caregiver from neighboring Clymer, said she supported the idea, adding that her two brothers and their children -- all Cherry Tree residents -- already have guns for hunting or protection.

"You just feel safer," she said. "All of them keep a loaded pistol. I even do, and I live in an apartment complex."

Retired coal miner Bill Schrock, 66, said he believes everyone should own a gun, but that the proposed ordinance was unnecessary.

"I think that guy just wanted to get on TV," said Schrock, who lives in a nearby town. "It ain't that bad around here. Might have a few sticky fingers around, that's all."

Diane Edbril, executive director of the gun-control advocacy group CeaseFirePA, said that "increasing the number of households with firearms will only increase the number of tragedies involving firearms in that community."

She said it would also create the potential for burglars to steal guns when they otherwise might have taken only a stereo.

http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centr...tredaily_local
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 01:57 PM
  #2  
spanky's Avatar
spanky
I go duffy on dem bitches
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 28,248
Likes: 0
From: Gonzales, Louisiana
Default

that should pass nationwide
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 02:01 PM
  #3  
M@rshy's Avatar
M@rshy
٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,807
Likes: 0
Default

Thats stupid. Then you get people with jumpy fingers shooting at everything that moves.
What if you can't afford a gun?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 02:45 PM
  #4  
19.3secS2K's Avatar
19.3secS2K
my bum is on the swedish!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,133
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

I'd like to go back in time and shoot the guy who invented the gun.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 02:55 PM
  #5  
k3ifers's Avatar
k3ifers
k three ifers
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,568
Likes: 4
From: Buffalo, NY
Default

i want a gun
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 02:57 PM
  #6  
spanky's Avatar
spanky
I go duffy on dem bitches
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 28,248
Likes: 0
From: Gonzales, Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by 19.3secFerio
I'd like to go back in time and shoot the guy who invented the gun.
:ugh: What is your reasoning for being against firearms?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #7  
spanky's Avatar
spanky
I go duffy on dem bitches
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 28,248
Likes: 0
From: Gonzales, Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by MarshyTheKid
Thats stupid. Then you get people with jumpy fingers shooting at everything that moves.
What if you can't afford a gun?
The point is to decrease crime. Do you think a criminal is more or less likely to break into a home where the possibility of the homeowner being armed is higher? Why do you think there are more crimes in places where there are more gun laws? Less crime where there are less gun laws?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #8  
19.3secS2K's Avatar
19.3secS2K
my bum is on the swedish!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,133
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by spankaveli
:ugh: What is your reasoning for being against firearms?
guns killed the art of warfare.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 03:04 PM
  #9  
spanky's Avatar
spanky
I go duffy on dem bitches
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 28,248
Likes: 0
From: Gonzales, Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by 19.3secFerio
guns killed the art of warfare.
That's your reasoning? :rofl: :ugh:
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 03:05 PM
  #10  
RB's Avatar
RB
snitches get stitches
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

thats back asswards.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:20 AM.