Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Weird keyboard question.

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 12:46 PM
  #1  
CRAIGHIMSELF's Avatar
CRAIGHIMSELF
Thread Starter
Be good
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 18,842
Likes: 0
From: Sloppy onshore junk.
Default Weird keyboard question.

Does anyone know why the keyboard letters are arranged the way they are? Did someone figure out that this is the easiest way to type? Just curious. My inquiring mind wants to know.

Also, why on a keypad on a computer are the 10 digits the exact opposite of that of a phone? (besides the zero being on bottom).
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 12:50 PM
  #2  
Brar's Avatar
Brar
|:]
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,182
Likes: 0
Default

the keypad is like a calculator, because that is what most people use it for

and yes I think they figured out this is the easiest way to type. Have you tried typing on an ABCD board? I haven't :hs:
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 12:50 PM
  #3  
RicoD's Avatar
RicoD
Pull my finger
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 41,423
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

creators of the keyboard figured out that by arranging the desired buttons to their current settings, it achieve the best balance to ying and yang.

so that the balance is not disturbed, the light reflecting off venus, is focus and amplified through a process known as keyboardism, which turns the yang energy to ying energy and vice versa.

from there, it is assume that the shortest distance between two points is in fact a line...




























im curious too
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 01:00 PM
  #4  
Misa's Avatar
Misa
Pic Whore
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 22,224
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default

from wiki - The QWERTY layout is certainly far from the most efficient, since it requires a touch-typist to move his or her fingers between rows to type the most common letters. A popular story suggests that it was used for early typewriters because it was inefficient; it slowed a typist down so as to reduce the frequency of the typewriter's typebars from wedging together and jamming the machine. A more likely explanation is that the QWERTY arrangement was designed to reduce the likelihood of internal clashing by placing commonly used combinations of letters farther away from each other inside the machine. This allowed the user to actually type faster without jamming. Unfortunately, no definitive explanation for the QWERTY keyboard has been found, and typewriter aficionados continue to debate the issue.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 01:02 PM
  #5  
CRAIGHIMSELF's Avatar
CRAIGHIMSELF
Thread Starter
Be good
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 18,842
Likes: 0
From: Sloppy onshore junk.
Default

Thanks!
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 01:06 PM
  #6  
THEOLDMAN's Avatar
THEOLDMAN
Checking it twice
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,539
Likes: 0
From: Twixt Hell/Ann Arbor MI
Default

The guy who invented the layout had a daughter her name was QWERT YUIOP.
__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming ...."WOW! What a ride!!!!!"

LUNCH with THEOLDMAN...On a break for now...
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 01:22 PM
  #7  
Llamaguy's Avatar
Llamaguy
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,301
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Default

you can move the keys around and reprogram the keyboard. It'll screw everyone up when they come over and use it.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 01:25 PM
  #8  
pierced1's Avatar
pierced1
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 0
From: middle of nowheres
Default

We do that to people all the time, you would be amazed at how many people have to look at the keys when they type. Even though they know where the letters are they have to type the letter on the key.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 03:31 PM
  #9  
James3370's Avatar
James3370
aka Heywoodjablowme
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,562
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

there's also a DVORAK keyboard layout...show below w/ the QWERTY keys in red

Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 04:08 PM
  #10  
Tark's Avatar
Tark
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 30,331
Likes: 0
From: Montréal, Canada
Default

read this and add cliff notes cause i didnt h:

A theory we have often heard is that the phone company intentionally reversed the calculator configuration so that people who were already fast at operating calculators would slow down enough to allow the signals of the phone to register. It's a neat theory, but it isn't true. Even today, fast punchers can render a touch-tone phone worthless.

Both the touch-tone key pad and the all-transistor calculator were made available to the general public in the early 1960s. Calculators were arranged from the beginning so that the lowest digits were on bottom. Telephone keypads put the 1-2-3 on the top row. Both configurations descended directly from earlier prototypes.

Before 1964, calculators were either mechanical or electronic devices with heavy tubes. The key pads on the first calculators actually resembled old cash registers, with the left row of keys numbering 9 on top down to 0 on the bottom. The next row to the right had 90 on top and 10 on the bottom, the next row to the right had 900 on top, 100 on the bottom, and so on. All of the early calculators were ten rows high, and most were nine rows wide. From the beginning, hand-held calculators placed 7-8-9 on the top row, from left to right.

Before the touch-tone phone, of course, rotary dials were the rule. There is no doubt that the touch-tone key pad was designed to mimic the rotary dial with the "1" on top and the 7-8-9 on the bottom. According to Bob Ford, of AT&T's Bell Laboratories, a second reason was that some phone-company research concluded that this configuration helped eliminate dialing errors. Ford related the story, which may or may not be apocryphal, that when AT&T contemplated the design of their key pad, they called several calculator companies, hoping they would share the research that led them to the opposite configuration. Much to their chargin, AT&T discovered that the calculator companies had conducted no research at all. From our contacts with Sharp and Texas Instruments, two pioneers in the calculator field, it seems that this story could easily be true.

It has also been suggested that if the lower numbers were on the bottom, the alphabet would then start on the bottom and be in reverse alphabetical order, a confusing setup. This might have entered AT&T's thinking, particularly in the "old days" when phone numbers contained only five digits, along with two exchange letters.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...=1006043015438
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:55 AM.