Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Canon To Stop Making Single-Lens Camera

Thread Tools
 
Old May 25, 2006 | 09:42 AM
  #1  
dubcac's Avatar
dubcac
Thread Starter
I
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,525
Likes: 0
From: Westside til I die
Default Canon To Stop Making Single-Lens Camera

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060525/...ge/japan_canon


No more development of new film cameras...just digital.

:eek3:
__________________
2015 Ford Mustang GT Fastback - Ingot Silver - 6M - Performance Package - Gibson Catback, JLT CAI, FR 47lb injectors, BAMA E85 tune, Eibach Sportline, BMR wheel hop kit, UPR oil separator, Steeda shifter bushing/bracket
Team B.O.B.® - Ballaz on a Budget
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 09:50 AM
  #2  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Nikon is already discontinuing all but two of their film SLRs (the F6 which is a big honkin pro model kinda like a D2x but with film, and either the FM3a or FM10 which are both old-skool manual focus). Konica Minolta completely dropped out of the camera business, but they sold their digital SLR stuff to Sony and Sony is currently providing support to existing K/M products, and will come out with new SLRs that use the Minolta SLR lens mount, flashes, etc. Canon's going to keep selling their film lineup, just not come out with any new ones.

I'll stick with film until I can really afford to drop the thousands of dollars necessary for buying autofocus lenses of comparable quality to my manual focus lenses that don't work on digital. Also Pentax is coming out with a 10 mp dSLR, and all of their dSLRs have full autoexposure compatibility with their old manual focus lenses dating back to the early 80s. The cheapest Nikon that can do that is the D200 and you have to enter the focal length and maximum aperture into the menu system every time you put a manual focus lens on so it knows how to calculate the exposure.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 10:25 AM
  #3  
e3NiNe's Avatar
e3NiNe
#CustomUserTitle
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 63,855
Likes: 1
From: glass case of emotion
Default

Kodak quit last year too.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 10:27 AM
  #4  
swaggs21's Avatar
swaggs21
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,747
Likes: 0
From: Lumberport, WV
Default

I think it is a smart move, especially once they get in the 10 meg range with their SLR series.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 10:51 AM
  #5  
tony's Avatar
tony
XBL: HotMilkGT // HAN H14
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,587
Likes: 0
Default

I think Kodak will eventually be the only company making films
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 12:06 PM
  #6  
dj02's Avatar
dj02
click click
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,651
Likes: 0
From: cali
Default

ya nikon did this all there old 35mm are going for a good price right now i was thinking of picking up a f4.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 03:15 PM
  #7  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Originally Posted by swaggs21
I think it is a smart move, especially once they get in the 10 meg range with their SLR series.
They currently have 17 and 13 megapixel models. h:

Last edited by MrFatbooty; May 25, 2006 at 05:36 PM.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 04:36 PM
  #8  
AcuraFanatic's Avatar
AcuraFanatic
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 37,274
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
Default

17 megapixel? holy crap
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 05:35 PM
  #9  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Originally Posted by AF
17 megapixel? holy crap
Technically 16.7...I rounded up.

http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=10598
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 08:12 PM
  #10  
canada's Avatar
canada
514.315.407.405
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 23,370
Likes: 0
From: Syracuse, NY... again.
Default

I want a new camera... but I am poor. Shit... I'd take an old camera... I just want to shoot again.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:17 PM.