playoffs baby!
Originally Posted by dj02
hahahahahahahaha thats like saying the lakers are going to win this year 

Originally Posted by egghead
If they even played Indy, they would not lose. The Nets won't lose any earlier than the conference finals, barring any injuries to the starters.
Nets were 1-2 agasint Indy too
ya...Nets were on a tear at the end of the season..i'll give them that. but i still dont think they have what it takes.
__________________
no sig
no sig
Originally Posted by dj02
hahahahahahahaha thats like saying the lakers are going to win this year 

__________________
no sig
no sig
Originally Posted by joebenz
Nets were 1-2 against the bulls. and that 1 win was 100-99 win with 1.5 secs left
Nets were 1-2 agasint Indy too
ya...Nets were on a tear at the end of the season..i'll give them that. but i still dont think they have what it takes.
Nets were 1-2 agasint Indy too
ya...Nets were on a tear at the end of the season..i'll give them that. but i still dont think they have what it takes.
Originally Posted by 93hondablk
The knicks got really good players and coach. They just need to forget about the past and all of the loses. They need some inspiration and motivation. I'v seen them play really good when they are motavated, and when they are in the mood they can beat any team. They just have to intimate the rest of the league.
Stephan Marbury is calling himself "Starbury" again. He promises to shoot more, become offensive minded, and disregard his Coach when on the court.
With 60M due, nobody is going to touch this guy if he were on the trading block. Right now, the Knicks would trade him for 3 practice balls and a few bottles of gatorade.
Originally Posted by joebenz
Nets were 1-2 against the bulls. and that 1 win was 100-99 win with 1.5 secs left
Nets were 1-2 agasint Indy too
ya...Nets were on a tear at the end of the season..i'll give them that. but i still dont think they have what it takes.
Nets were 1-2 agasint Indy too
ya...Nets were on a tear at the end of the season..i'll give them that. but i still dont think they have what it takes.
It's true that the Bulls have matched up pretty well against the Nets, but those two wins were during a Net slump, and following the 14-game win streak when the Nets were already locked into the 3 seed.
Indiana's wins also came during that same slump, and at the beginning of the season when the Nets were admittedly nothing special.
Each team still has a game or two left, so we still don't know who the Nets will be playing anyway. I still don't see them going down to any of the bottom four in a seven-game series.
Originally Posted by egghead
It's true that the Bulls have matched up pretty well against the Nets, but those two wins were during a Net slump, and following the 14-game win streak when the Nets were already locked into the 3 seed.
Indiana's wins also came during that same slump, and at the beginning of the season when the Nets were admittedly nothing special.
Each team still has a game or two left, so we still don't know who the Nets will be playing anyway. I still don't see them going down to any of the bottom four in a seven-game series.
Indiana's wins also came during that same slump, and at the beginning of the season when the Nets were admittedly nothing special.
Each team still has a game or two left, so we still don't know who the Nets will be playing anyway. I still don't see them going down to any of the bottom four in a seven-game series.
__________________
no sig
no sig


