View Poll Results: JDM Front End or JRSC?

JDM

60.87%

JRSC

39.13%

Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

JDM front end or JRSC?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Jan 16, 2006 | 05:31 AM

#21

RicoD

Pull my finger

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 41,423

Likes: 0

From: Arizona

Quote:

Originally Posted by [Damnit]

tc ftw, sc ftl, jdm front end=waste of money if u already have a funtional front end

someone with some brain

h:

turbo....

Jan 16, 2006 | 09:04 AM

#22

dubcac

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 56,525

Likes: 0

From: Westside til I die

Quote:

Originally Posted by AP2

Front end because that blower on your LS won't do shit.

Fuckin :werd:

Quote:

Originally Posted by LT

the purpose of a supercharger is to make more power through a linear powerband. the vortech centrifugal supercharger has about as narrow a powerband as Lee's penis.

That is the purpose of a roots style blower. I think the Vortech still makes more power throughout the entire rev band than the JRSC does, and a shitload more peak power. But I'd advise a turbo over either.

__________________
2015 Ford Mustang GT Fastback - Ingot Silver - 6M - Performance Package - Gibson Catback, JLT CAI, FR 47lb injectors, BAMA E85 tune, Eibach Sportline, BMR wheel hop kit, UPR oil separator, Steeda shifter bushing/bracket
Team B.O.B.® - Ballaz on a Budget

Jan 16, 2006 | 09:22 AM

#23

spanky

I go duffy on dem bitches

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 28,248

Likes: 0

From: Gonzales, Louisiana

full race turbo > both

Jan 16, 2006 | 03:14 PM

#24

shirley

CBOTY 2010

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 34,786

Likes: 0

From: MI

if i had to choose one or the other id say jdm front end but personally id take that money and spend it on some upgrades that will improve a base teggys performance. as everyone stated if u want to go FI then get a turbo kit, otherwise possibly some suspension upgrades to improve the handling.

Jan 16, 2006 | 06:51 PM

#25

Hans Stoner

Thread Starter

pimpin' south jersey

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 1,844

Likes: 0

From: jersey / philly

I forgot to mention that the jrsc is going on a built b20 with a p&p head and crower 402's..........that should yeild a fun car, I'm not trying to break land speed records......

I think my car is fun now, and with a built b20 and jrsc, it should be fun as hell.....

Jan 16, 2006 | 06:54 PM

#26

AcuraFanatic

Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2000

Posts: 37,274

Likes: 0

From: Southern NH

Why the hell would you want a blower vs a turbo?

Jan 16, 2006 | 06:56 PM

#27

umop-apisdn

Allergic to vitamin D

Joined: Jun 2002

Posts: 6,032

Likes: 0

From: Earth

I'd save the money and put it towards a RWD/AWD sportscar instead of trying to make one out of a FWD economy car. Keep the 'teg as a daily driver.

Jan 16, 2006 | 06:56 PM

#28

Omniscient

warm butter on toast

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 6,485

Likes: 0

From: The boonies, CT

I've pondered it a few times. It would just be something different. If I had the 3.5k$ to blow on a supercharger and not car about the end results I probably would.