Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

the new Fit...

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 08:36 PM
  #41  
tegbooster's Avatar
tegbooster
Resident Ninja-photo'er
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,964
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim, CA
Default

u know i've been wondering that for a while actually...is it like a cartoon cop smoking...and why is the smoke all in his face... SO CONFUSED
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 09:03 PM
  #42  
R_Squared's Avatar
R_Squared
Thread Starter
LEVEL UP
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,426
Likes: 1
From: Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by redgoober4life
wtf is with yours?
It's supposed to be Kikko Man...this should answer your question: http://yoga.at.infoseek.co.jp/flash/kikkomaso_e.htm
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 09:07 PM
  #43  
M@rshy's Avatar
M@rshy
٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,807
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by red94teg
It's supposed to be Kikko Man...this should answer your question: http://yoga.at.infoseek.co.jp/flash/kikkomaso_e.htm
:rofl: Thats funny. Warning: Do not try this at home kids.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 09:41 PM
  #44  
M@rshy's Avatar
M@rshy
٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,807
Likes: 0
Default

It consistently did the 0-60mph run at a time of between 8.7 to 9.0 seconds for an average of just above 8.8 seconds !! This was really astonishing especially at the time I was doing the runs. By comparison, the 'reference' cars in the mid-sized and full-sized 'sports-sedan' segment, the Civic 2.0 i-VTEC and the local Accord 2.4 i-VTEC returned averaged times of 8.5 and 8.6 seconds respectively, not a lot faster than what the Jazz did
Theres alot of cool features, like a 7-speed sport mode where the car changed the gear ratio automaticly.
As for the standing quarter mile acceleration test, the Jazz VTEC completes the quarter mile run between 16.9 to 17.1 seconds. Again this compares well to the Civic 2.0 i-VTEC and Accord 2.4 i-VTEC which delivered 16.5 - 16.7 sec and 16.5 - 16.9 sec respectively. The 'Trap speed' for the runs are between 86 to 88mph (137-141 kph) which also compares well to the Civic 2.0 i-VTEC and especially Accord 2.4 i-VTEC.
The Jazz VTEC took between 133-138 feet to stop from 60mph. This is in comparison to the 138ft required by the Civic 2.0 i-VTEC and the Accord 2.4 i-VTEC. So as can be seen, the Jazz VTEC stops relatively very well.
He said the braking wasn't how he would have liked it.
A big problem I had in getting good results is the initial 'bite' from the brakes. The brake pedal is reasonably firm but the brakes does not seem to bite to moderate pressure. So I couldn't use progressive braking which I normally do to avoid the ABS cutting in. The Jazz VTEC does not shed off speed well from light to moderate brake pedal pressure and returned so-so results when squeezing the pedal. Eventually I had to resort to jamming hard on the brakes right from the start in order to get the Jazz to stop in the shortest possible distance. It wasn't totally possible to avoid letting the ABS cut in and so a lot of the results in this test were with the ABS working for quite a part of the braking. Nevertheless, even so the braking distances are certainly relatively good, in fact the best results of all the cars I have tested from Honda Malaysia thus far. But if only the brake response had been better, I am confident I would've obtained even better results. Another area in terms of braking that I wasn't totally happy with is the tendency of the Honda Malaysia review unit to exhibit a mild 'tail shake' during the braking tests. The rear seems just a tad unstable but there's no feeling that it will come lose, just a slight barely perceptible 'wagging' of the rear.
I recommend reading this site. I just read all of it and feel educated a bit more with the car. It took me 30-40 minutes to read it but worth the time IMO.
http://asia.vtec.net/Reviews/JazzVtec/
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 10:45 PM
  #45  
sirg-vtec's Avatar
sirg-vtec
I just wanted to fit in.
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
Default

and the enemy...





I would pick the two door vitz rs over the fit...

Last edited by sirg-vtec; Jan 15, 2006 at 10:50 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 10:58 PM
  #46  
M@rshy's Avatar
M@rshy
٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,807
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sirg-vtec
and the enemy...


I would pick the two door vitz rs over the fit...
Whats that? Same as the ones above it only 2 door? The 4 door looks fugly to me.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 11:07 PM
  #47  
Anthony's Avatar
Anthony
ZOMG Pew Pew Laserbeams
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MarshyTheKid
Whats that? Same as the ones above it only 2 door? The 4 door looks fugly to me.
toyota yaris
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 11:07 PM
  #48  
sirg-vtec's Avatar
sirg-vtec
I just wanted to fit in.
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
Default

that is correct sir. I believe the vitz rs is Rear wheel drive, no?
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 11:11 PM
  #49  
Anthony's Avatar
Anthony
ZOMG Pew Pew Laserbeams
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sirg-vtec
that is correct sir. I believe the vitz rs is Rear wheel drive, no?
don't think toyota made any rwd affordable cars for a long while.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2006 | 03:20 AM
  #50  
tegbooster's Avatar
tegbooster
Resident Ninja-photo'er
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,964
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim, CA
Default

holy shit... that kikkoman song... i think i broke a funny.... i can't laugh anymore

"smoking is bad... it even kills bacteria" :lmfao:
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:25 AM.