Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Any lawyers here?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 12:13 AM
  #11  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

They didn't repeal it. They just changed the number of months of rent the tenant has to pay in penalty.

With this statute I definitely go talk to a lawyer and see what's up.

Word of caution though, not all states are this nice about early lease termination.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 12:17 AM
  #12  
LABARINTH's Avatar
LABARINTH
Thread Starter
Better Than Canada!
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

http://mlis.state.md.us/PDF-Document...hb/hb1144f.PDF
(a) In Baltimore City, a liquidated damages clause or penalty clause in a residential lease is not enforceable. If a tenant fails or refuses to take possession of or vacates the dwelling unit before the end of his term, the tenant is liable to the landlord for loss of rent caused by the termination or [two] 6 months' rent, whichever is less, in addition to the cost of repairing damage to the premises which may have been caused by an act or omission of the tenant.
The key part is "whichever is less". Well I'm pretty sure her $0 loss of rent is going to be less than 3 months rent. As long as this is the law I think I just won my case. I'm going to talk to a lawyer later today.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 12:19 AM
  #13  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

I agree, also the state law also says that the landlord is legally obligated to mitigate damages, and since she found another tenant, the damages are mitigated, so she has no legal claim to the penaly at this point.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 12:20 AM
  #14  
LABARINTH's Avatar
LABARINTH
Thread Starter
Better Than Canada!
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

however this confuses me....this makes it sound like that law I was talking about was repealed. http://www.stuartkaplow.com/library3.cfm?article_id=45
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 12:25 AM
  #15  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Oooh bad news. The first link you gave me was the first reading of the bill. There is actually a third (and final) reading where they ended up cutting the whole Section 8-212.

Linky
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 12:32 AM
  #16  
LABARINTH's Avatar
LABARINTH
Thread Starter
Better Than Canada!
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

yeah that is what I was afraid of. Anyway, I may still have a case based on what you posted earlier
Originally Posted by Maryland Statutes
Financial Consequences: Tenants who move before the lease term ends may be responsible for continuing rent even though they no longer living at the premises. However, the landlord has a legal obligation to mitigate damages. This means the landlord must make reasonable efforts to find a new tenant and may not charge the old tenant continuing rent once the new tenant moves in. (The landlord is not necessarily required to rent out the unit "ahead" of others where there are vacancies in the building). The tenant is responsible for reasonable costs associated with finding a new tenant, such as advertising fees.
I will see what the lawyer says later today.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 08:39 AM
  #17  
canada's Avatar
canada
514.315.407.405
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 23,370
Likes: 0
From: Syracuse, NY... again.
Default

i dunno bro... good luck
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 09:28 AM
  #18  
shady visions's Avatar
shady visions
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LABARINTH
1. it is illegal to charge someone rent for an apartment that someone else is already paying rent for.
this is true here. I know this because I helped my friend's mom move her and her kids out of her old house that they were renting to one they were buying, and they found someone to take over and the landlord tried to charge them for the rent when there was already someone there renting.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 09:40 AM
  #19  
Red X's Avatar
Red X
x pǝɹ
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,246
Likes: 1
From: Upstate
Default

Hope it works out. If those bills got repealed, its pretty obvious that shes charging you not for damages, but for ending early.

I say call her and talk to her nicely and see if you can get her to just give up. Explain that she hasn't lost any money, and that you are recieving legal advice, and might potentially challenge her request.

Hopefully it'll scare her enough into just forgetting about it.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 10:23 AM
  #20  
Josh M's Avatar
Josh M
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SolarWind
Hope it works out. If those bills got repealed, its pretty obvious that shes charging you not for damages, but for ending early.

I say call her and talk to her nicely and see if you can get her to just give up. Explain that she hasn't lost any money, and that you are recieving legal advice, and might potentially challenge her request.

Hopefully it'll scare her enough into just forgetting about it.

If she is not a complete cock gobblin she will know that whatever legal action he pursues technically he did break the contract and has to go by the terms which he signed on to begin with.........If I were his landlord and he ended his lease early with me and said he was going to take legal action against me when I have a signed document that clearly states the terms I would laugh at him.

Your best bet is to try to reason with her. Don't go making threats about legal advice and atorneys because that will just piss her off and when it comes down to it you did sign the lease. Maybe offer her half of your security deposit or something? Also if you do take legal action and go to small claims court and when you lose you could be tagged for her legal fees and court costs as well.............so don't go the lawyer route and don't even mention that to her, it won't help your situation
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:12 PM.