Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

So much for night pics - cop bugged me then my camera broke...arghhh!!!

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 01:06 AM
  #1  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Thread Starter
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default So much for night pics - cop bugged me then my camera broke...arghhh!!!

I ventured out this evening to take some nighttime shots of the various buildings on campus and assorted other things I might find interesting. First stop was at one of the libraries. I set up the camera, and in the middle of a set of bracketed long exposures this cop pulls up. He asked me,

"So why you taking pictures?"

"Um, I'm just taking pictures."

"Well people have different reasons for taking pictures."

"Okay...I like to take pictures, and tonight I thought I'd take some pictures of different buildings on campus."

"So is this a hobby of yours?"

"Yeah."

"Well, um, okay then."

During this little exchange the camera also finished doing its dance of three subsequent long exposures. Luckily myself and the cop were out of the shot.

Then, I took the camera off the tripod and moved to turn it off. But the dreaded problem I thought my camera would never have, happened: the command dial that selects the different shooting modes. This was a flaw with the original Canon EOS Elan, and EOS A2 cameras. I figured mine wouldn't have the problem since it's been fine for 8 years. Once the dial breaks, it no longer clicks into position for each of the shooting modes and the LCD display just blinks. No pics to be taken.

Disappointed, I went home. Now I have to decide if I just want to have the camera fixed (~$100), pick up another one on ebay, upgrade to something like an EOS 1n, EOS 1v or EOS 3, sell it on ebay and switch over to digital, yadda yadda yadda. Not what I wanted to have happen. Dangit.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 01:09 AM
  #2  
tony's Avatar
tony
XBL: HotMilkGT // HAN H14
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,587
Likes: 0
Default

R.I.P. camera
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 01:19 AM
  #3  
evolution's Avatar
evolution
早晨好, 先生們!™ 粉腸+ 春袋
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 8,730
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Time for a new one!
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 05:44 AM
  #4  
canada's Avatar
canada
514.315.407.405
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 23,370
Likes: 0
From: Syracuse, NY... again.
Default

If you arent getting it fixed... any ideas whats to do with it? :rick:
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 09:44 AM
  #5  
wedley2's Avatar
wedley2
bboy Wesley West
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,390
Likes: 0
From: six-five-o
Default

its the cops fault!
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 10:11 AM
  #6  
THEOLDMAN's Avatar
THEOLDMAN
Checking it twice
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,539
Likes: 0
From: Twixt Hell/Ann Arbor MI
Default

It was the night air!!
__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming ...."WOW! What a ride!!!!!"

LUNCH with THEOLDMAN...On a break for now...
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 11:52 AM
  #7  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Thread Starter
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

See here's the thing, I've always been rather limited by the price of good autofocus lenses for my camera. Autofocus is nice and everything, but the lenses are freakin ridiculously expensive. So now that mine's broken I'm considering selling my lenses and going back to manual focus.

Tokina makes a very nice 80-200 mm f/2.8 zoom that's pretty common in Nikon AI-S manual focus mount and findable but kind of rare in Canon FD manual focus mount. Either way it can usually be had for under 300 bucks.

Super sharp Canon FD prime lenses can be had ridiculously cheap since old Canons are generally less collectible than old Nikons. A Canon FD 28mm f/2.8 can easily be had for about $100, and a 50mm f/1.4 for like $60. So I'm kinda seriously considering getting a Canon T90 which is kind of like a Canon EOS 1 but made just before the EOS cameras were introduced. It takes the FD manual focus lenses and is pretty sophisticated. It has a few features that my EOS A2 does not have like a magnesium body, multi-spot metering, lighted external LCD display, and flash exposure lock.

It's also missing some features on my EOS A2, a couple of which I use rather frequently. It has no mirror lockup whatsoever. On the A2 I can set a custom function for the self timer button so when the timer is on, pressing the shutter flips up the mirror and fires the shutter two seconds later. T90, no dice. There's a self timer that can be set to either 2 or 10 second delay but no mirror lockup. There's a way to have it "hacked" so to speak, to get mirror lockup, but that solution is rather inelegant. So basically, no mirror lockup, the best that can be done is to set a 2-second self timer and use a wired remote.

Both cameras have similar flash metering system. Where they differ is in how they get proper flash exposures of off-center subjects. On my EOS A2 it has a multi-zone flash metering sensor so I just pick the focus point over the subject and the camera shifts emphasis to that part of the frame. The T90 requires a bit more fiddling: point the center of the frame at the subject, press a button to send out a preflash, then set the flash exposure lock and recompose the scene. Exposure wise they're equally accurate, the multi-zone system is just easier. Coincidentally, Canon reintroduced that flash exposure lock system on their newer EOS cameras, so who knows, maybe it's better.

If I can get past the flash metering thing I could always pick up a Nikon FE2 or FA which are also both very nice and I would get mirror lockup. But again, with Nikon being so collectible there's not really much of a way to get super cheap glass like there is with Canon. Well, cheap, just not quite as cheap. Plus to do multiple exposures without touching the camera between shots I'd need to get an external motor drive since neither of those have built in motorized film advances.

There are plenty of autofocus film camera bodies that would suit my needs, but then I'd have the same old problem of wanting the highest quality lenses but them being far more money than I want to spend.

Hmmm.....

Last edited by MrFatbooty; Jul 24, 2005 at 12:31 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 04:29 AM
  #8  
THEOLDMAN's Avatar
THEOLDMAN
Checking it twice
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,539
Likes: 0
From: Twixt Hell/Ann Arbor MI
Default

That's the reason I can't break away from my Pentax's, first I'd have to get a camera body and lenses right away together, and to get a body that is at least equivalent to the PZ-1 I'd end up spending a small fortune all over again. The PZ-1 has trap shoot capability that's great for catching action through a preset zone, but it doesn't do much for battery life.
__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming ...."WOW! What a ride!!!!!"

LUNCH with THEOLDMAN...On a break for now...
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:33 PM.