CPU upgrade question for the comp guys
#1
37 ?!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CPU upgrade question for the comp guys
ok, i built my PC about 4 years ago, it's got an athlon 1.2Ghz socket 462/socket A.
the motherboard is an asus A7V133 200/266 FSB.
if i buy a 1.8GHz duron socket A 266FSB (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...2E16819104160), can i put in it with no probs ?
the motherboard is an asus A7V133 200/266 FSB.
if i buy a 1.8GHz duron socket A 266FSB (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...2E16819104160), can i put in it with no probs ?
#4
chris is the devil
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: so cal 951 + 760
Posts: 8,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dE.fUsEd
don't see the point. you aren't going to notice much of a difference at all.
that is, unless its free of course.
#6
37 ?!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sherwood
memory upgrade > * that is unless your computer rarely goes above 50% useage
i think the motherboard is messed up, the keyboard and mouse ports dont work (i use USB kb and mouse), im just trying to get as much life as i can out of it before building a whole new comp. dont have the cash for that at the moment. the new 1.8GHz CPU is only like $43. maybe a new video card would help, this one is only 32MB.
#8
As in PC133 SDRAM as used by this board.
http://www.ocworkbench.com/hardware/...3/a7v133p1.htm
The chip operates on a DDR principle internally (133/266), that's why it's so fast. The same for Duron 1800 which is faster by 600MHz than that Thunderbird-C in question. Aside from the reduced L2 cache, the Duron 1800MHz runs the core at a faster speed than the Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino), which is 1733MHz. You also get SSE support; apps that use such instructions show significant increases in speed not to mention the Intel-beating FPU performance.
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...spx?i=1927&p=1
Athlon is good but there are price, availability and compatibility issues to iron out.
However if the user wants to also run 3D games then the graphics card is critical.
A slow hard drive will also hinder performance.
http://www.ocworkbench.com/hardware/...3/a7v133p1.htm
The chip operates on a DDR principle internally (133/266), that's why it's so fast. The same for Duron 1800 which is faster by 600MHz than that Thunderbird-C in question. Aside from the reduced L2 cache, the Duron 1800MHz runs the core at a faster speed than the Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino), which is 1733MHz. You also get SSE support; apps that use such instructions show significant increases in speed not to mention the Intel-beating FPU performance.
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...spx?i=1927&p=1
Athlon is good but there are price, availability and compatibility issues to iron out.
However if the user wants to also run 3D games then the graphics card is critical.
A slow hard drive will also hinder performance.