Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

whats your opinion on the Z4?

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-08-2005, 04:02 PM
  #1  
HawtPants
the one and only
Thread Starter
 
HawtPants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Govenator Territory
Posts: 15,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default whats your opinion on the Z4?



the base 2.5L is like 31k...comparable to the s2k
not quite 240hp but still looks hawt

looks like a cac on wheels :reechy:

discuss:
Old 05-08-2005, 04:04 PM
  #2  
ED9man
driver
 
ED9man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HawtPants
[IMG]=
looks like a cac on wheels :reechy:
:lmao:
I'm never going to be able to look at it the same way again.

I've never been too fond of the styling. I'd take an S2K in a second over that. I've also heard the SMG really sucks.
Old 05-08-2005, 04:05 PM
  #3  
DakarM
 
DakarM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Location Location
Posts: 44,908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

IMO it's ugly and it's selling like turd.

The base 2.5L will get a power boost later this year with the new N52 engine which will bring it up to 215hp.

yeah it drives quite nicely but I can't get over the really poor styling.
__________________
'00 Dakar Bus CRS Edition
LCD Squad #0001
Originally Posted by WiLL
...I really wanna get out and shoot people.
Old 05-08-2005, 04:56 PM
  #4  
TheOtherDave™
Apathy Kills
 
TheOtherDave™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Left Lane
Posts: 60,714
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ugly as sin... just like every other Bangle / Van Hooydonk monstrosity. :ugh:

Even if they offered one w/ 450hp for $35K, I still wouldn't buy it. IMO, it's that ugly.
__________________
:: :ToDspin: - supermod - but who gives a shit?

:: HAN Integra FAQ: If, by some miracle, yours hasn't been stolen... check it out!
Old 05-08-2005, 05:00 PM
  #5  
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
MrFatbooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Although some of the surface details are a little odd, the overall proportions are pretty good. It could stand to lose a bit of front overhang though. Once it gets the new valvetronic engines it should be pretty interesting. I guess if you want a roadster that's kinda luxurious as opposed to the overtly sporting S2000, and don't want to pay for an SLK or Boxster, then this'll do. I'd probably go for a lightly used Boxster though.
Old 05-08-2005, 06:43 PM
  #6  
RB26DETT
Eagles > NFL
 
RB26DETT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: nj
Posts: 10,225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its not ugly. but its not hot either.
Old 05-08-2005, 06:49 PM
  #7  
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
sherwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

it's a fugggling oogly peice of sheot
Old 05-08-2005, 08:57 PM
  #8  
HawtPants
the one and only
Thread Starter
 
HawtPants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Govenator Territory
Posts: 15,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i like how the ass looks :dunno:
Old 05-08-2005, 09:05 PM
  #9  
Tinker Bell
mexikin who?
 
Tinker Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: mazatlan, Sinaloa MeksIK0
Posts: 7,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that car looks like its about to transform into something :nervous:
Old 05-08-2005, 09:12 PM
  #10  
Nelson
Administrator
 
Nelson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 56,733
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Test drove an auto 2.5 auto, I was impressed with the pep. The stylying grew on me too
__________________
9Y0 Cayenne GTS
E46 ///M3
YD4 MDX
- SOLD
EG Ferio - SOLD

FA Ferio - Returned
www.NelsonLee.net






All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:56 AM.