Some people have 50 bagillion quotes in their sig. I wouldn't mind if they were turned off and you had to go into the person's profile...

 

What's the justification behind it? I don't see a problem with it if there were stricts policies in place to enforce them. Any form of nudity or NWS material could be prohibited. :dunno:

 

why :dunno: it isnt now, look at the sigs about suckin the meat or doin it better etc.... granted i think pics are worse but they cant be much more offensive than some of the text people have now....

:ibsomembodysayssomethingaboutnutsvibrateoff:

 

g2ic had this feature that limited someone's sig to the first time they posted in the thread, then disabled it anytime they posted in that same thread from then on...so if we turned on images again, maybe would could do this to compromise?

 

I'm fine with no sig images.

Even some of the current avatars are a bit out of line.

I view HAN at work... and work doesnt' like cute pictures on my screen. There are many other people in similar situations.

 

:werd: i dont think id have a sig image either.... but some text sigs and avatars are def. NWS and i find myself scrolling past as quickly as possible to make sure nobody around me catches a glimpse...

 

You guys know that these can be disabled through User CP right? You have the option on whether or not to view signatures, display images, display avatars, etc.

 

Yea and switch back and forth from work and home and work and home and work and home and work and home and work and home... no.

Besides... as long as they are all in line and all, having those things enabled helps read posts quicker. 99% of avatars and sigs are unique, so its faster for me to look at a picture than to read the name.

 

Come on...it's not that hard. If you're worried about being caught on HAN at work anyway you shouldn't be on.

 

i just turned the sigs off, everything seems so much cleaner now h: