Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Annual rant on security and cyber terrorism

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 04:38 PM
  #11  
DakarM's Avatar
DakarM
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 44,908
Likes: 0
From: Location Location
Default

Originally Posted by axemansean
No a lot do... John aka Nightshade was doing some idle research on cryptography. Last time we generated a few pages of solid discussions.

a lot = 1 other person?
__________________
'00 Dakar Bus CRS Edition
LCD Squad #0001
Originally Posted by WiLL
...I really wanna get out and shoot people.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 04:39 PM
  #12  
benjamin's Avatar
benjamin
Stuff and things.
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

Calm down man. Quantum computers notwithstanding, it will always be easier to increase keyspace than it will be to brute force crack the same key. Distributed.net is working on RSA Labs 72-bit key right now, but the amount of time required to encrypt something with a massively larger key isn't a big deal - say, 512 bit or even 1024 bit.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 04:40 PM
  #13  
HYBRID's Avatar
HYBRID
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,792
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by DaKarMaul
Honestly I don't think anyone really cares enough to make a serious comment. This is the wrong website for this.
ahhahah hahahah :lmfao:
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 04:40 PM
  #14  
DakarM's Avatar
DakarM
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 44,908
Likes: 0
From: Location Location
Default

Originally Posted by benjamin
Calm down man. Quantum computers notwithstanding, it will always be easier to increase keyspace than it will be to brute force crack the same key. Distributed.net is working on RSA Labs 72-bit key right now, but the amount of time required to encrypt something with a massively larger key isn't a big deal - say, 512 bit or even 1024 bit.

:werd: it's projected that :

The odds are 1 in 268,365 that we will wrap this thing
up in the next 24 hours. (This also means that we'll
hit 100% in 268,365 days at yesterday's rate.)

this is with a huge shit load of computers trying to crack it. I'm part of a team that Click heads and it takes a long time for 1 key.
__________________
'00 Dakar Bus CRS Edition
LCD Squad #0001
Originally Posted by WiLL
...I really wanna get out and shoot people.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 04:41 PM
  #15  
benjamin's Avatar
benjamin
Stuff and things.
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

Er, for those who don't know about distributed.net -- its like SETI@Home. A client application uses your idle processor cycles to work on a block of math, then return the result to the distributed.net server.

http://www.distributed.net/rc5/
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 04:42 PM
  #16  
axemansean's Avatar
axemansean
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by benjamin
Calm down man. Quantum computers notwithstanding, it will always be easier to increase keyspace than it will be to brute force crack the same key. Distributed.net is working on RSA Labs 72-bit key right now, but the amount of time required to encrypt something with a massively larger key isn't a big deal - say, 512 bit or even 1024 bit.
Yes but increasing keyspace requires going through a lot of red tape. Brute force may be impossible, but there are ways you can smarten your search space.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 04:44 PM
  #17  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

off topic:
i think p2p should be the basis for web browsers nowadays.
this would make downloads much faster as well as lower bandwidth needs of sites... downloading of files would be done an a person to person basis, and all in all, if everyone behaves nothing bad should happen, but there are certain assholes around..
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #18  
axemansean's Avatar
axemansean
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DRfrank
off topic:
i think p2p should be the basis for web browsers nowadays.
this would make downloads much faster as well as lower bandwidth needs of sites... downloading of files would be done an a person to person basis, and all in all, if everyone behaves nothing bad should happen, but there are certain assholes around..
If everyone behaved we wouldn't have criminals.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 05:22 PM
  #19  
benjamin's Avatar
benjamin
Stuff and things.
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by axemansean
Yes but increasing keyspace requires going through a lot of red tape. Brute force may be impossible, but there are ways you can smarten your search space.
Red tape? What are you talking about?
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:56 AM.