kerry pulled ahead this morning
Originally Posted by 99civic_love
i just had some more
why don't you order some? 
why don't you order some? 
h:The best pizza is down the street from the house...ask Mandi, she'll vouch for it. Fresh slices of tomato in with the sauce layer...mmmm....:yumyum: :drool:
__________________
2015 Ford Mustang GT Fastback - Ingot Silver - 6M - Performance Package - Gibson Catback, JLT CAI, FR 47lb injectors, BAMA E85 tune, Eibach Sportline, BMR wheel hop kit, UPR oil separator, Steeda shifter bushing/bracket
Team B.O.B.® - Ballaz on a Budget
2015 Ford Mustang GT Fastback - Ingot Silver - 6M - Performance Package - Gibson Catback, JLT CAI, FR 47lb injectors, BAMA E85 tune, Eibach Sportline, BMR wheel hop kit, UPR oil separator, Steeda shifter bushing/bracket
Team B.O.B.® - Ballaz on a Budget
It amazes me that there are so many random statistics out there. When the redskins win the last home game before the election, the incumbent wins. If the headline on the wallstreet journal has an even number of letters the challenger wins. When lots of imaginary and dead people vote, the catholic democrat from Massachusets wins. It is always something.
I brought up the Redskins thing for purposes of sarcasm. The polls say "likely voters," but what the hell is a likely voter anyway? All data based on polls of "likely voters" is contingent on the pollsters getting that first part right. Given the extent to which this race for president has deviated from norms, I contend that a poll of "likely voters" is in this case not necessarily representative of the turnout come election day.
Likely voters huh?.....so if they are likely to vote then they are equally as likely not to vote.
Or is my line of reasoning to obvious to be understood?
Or is my line of reasoning to obvious to be understood?
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Hopefully me and my fellow MoveOn.org volunteers have made a noticeable contribution to the amount of those unlikely voters. The heads at the top seem to think so but I'm going to remain cautiously hopeful.
Originally Posted by Tobra
It amazes me that there are so many random statistics out there. When the redskins win the last home game before the election, the incumbent wins. If the headline on the wallstreet journal has an even number of letters the challenger wins. When lots of imaginary and dead people vote, the catholic democrat from Massachusets wins. It is always something.
Bush can lose Ohio and still win the election. It's possible.
Not 'statistically likely' but definitely possible.
Likewise, MoveOn dot org and Soros are funneling so much money that statistically, Kerry can't lose. But a lot of money can't buy you an election... especially if the other candidate(s) have big bankrolls too.


