should I get time warner cable or sbc dsl?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Sep 8, 2004 | 05:21 PM

#11

ADRteg

Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 2,322

Likes: 0

From: NoVa / Richmond, VA

all i know is that cable is much faster/reliable than dsl here in richmond

Sep 8, 2004 | 06:00 PM

#12

Nelson

Administrator ☂

Joined: Jul 2002

Posts: 56,734

Likes: 3

From: NY

Quote:

Originally Posted by dE.fUsEd

cable > dsl

Quote:

Originally Posted by RB

Cable > dsl

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOLDIER [X]

cable > dsl

__________________
9Y0 Cayenne GTS
E46 ///M3
YD4 MDX - SOLD
EG Ferio - SOLD
FA Ferio - Returned
www.NelsonLee.net

Sep 8, 2004 | 06:05 PM

#13

umop-apisdn

Allergic to vitamin D

Joined: Jun 2002

Posts: 6,032

Likes: 0

From: Earth

From all the accounts i've heard, SBC sucks the donkey dick.

Sep 8, 2004 | 06:11 PM

#14

Black2KGSR

Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 21,463

Likes: 0

From: Charlotte, NC

Cable > DSL
I've had both. Cable is $5 cheaper (here anyway), and about twice as fast.

Sep 9, 2004 | 01:32 AM

#15

brtecson

pukimonster

Joined: Jun 2002

Posts: 9,967

Likes: 2

From: Milwaukee, WI

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black2000GSR

Cable > DSL
I've had both. Cable is $5 cheaper (here anyway), and about twice as fast.

same here.

Sep 9, 2004 | 04:56 AM

#16

Hambone

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 9,654

Likes: 0

From: West Michigan

Cable > DSL from my experience. I used to have cable internet in Maine and now I'm stuck with DSL here in Michigan. Oh how I miss my cable internet.....

Reply Subscribe

Reply Share

First
Prev
2 / 2
Next
Last

Forum Jump