Could they have used any worse of quality of video?
The flash, could it be lighting of shattering Windows? That buldge? Could it be just an odd angle? A lot of planes do have designed buldges and shapes on the under side... a 747, 777, and 767 all do for instance.... Also, a lot of planes have external fuel tanks - both under wings and some under the belly. Southwest does this more than any others...

 

We still haven't figured out JFK, I doubt we'll figure out 9/11 anytime soon.

 

I agree with JP. I call :bs:

 

Well you are allowed that for sure. But they showed some pretty interesting photos (that are also avaliable on the armys website) that show no wreckage at the pentagon. There's a hole in the side of the pentagon big enough for a car, not a plane. Where's the plane?

There was also photos (yes they could be fake I admit) that show fairly clearly there were no windows on the 2nd plane. That would mean, if in fact it had no windows, that it would be a non passenger plane. So where's the real plane that we were told crashed into the WTC? Where are those people?

I don't doubt that Osama hates the US and it's very possible that he was behind it. But there's some pretty real looking evidence that says things might have been a little diffrent than what we really saw.

What we were told happened at WTC on 9/11 was aweful. Horrific. But even just the thought that a whole plane full of people never actually crashed into the second building... is even worse. Seeing masses of innocent people die is aweful, but being lied to about how many and there being the possibilty that those people are alive or who knows what, is even worse.

 

I never believed the original story anyway. Call me a conspiracy theorist if you will.

:lmfao:

 

I agree, it is pretty poor quality. Probably to help entice you to "donate" $20 and they'll send you a DVD copy of the whole thing.

They said the 2nd plane with the bulge and the flash before impact could be seen from 4 diffrent angles from, obvisouly, 4 diffrent cameras.

I don't know what the flash could have been. A bomb? Sure, but why? What would be the point of a bomb going off just before impact? Maybe to do damage to the building before the plane hits to possibly make it easier for the plane to enter the building. I'm not sure, that's the only idea I can think of. I don't know of any other reason why there would be a flash of any kind unless it was a bomb.

It's also very possible that it could have been an extra fuel tank. I don't know.

 

Look at the actual wreckage on the side of the WTC before the plane explodes, that doesn't look like a "Plane" other than the wings all you see is a "small hole the size of a car" and some of the wings.

So I offer this. What if the plane that hit the Pentagon came straight down, nose dive on the edge, wouldnt you have a "small hole" and relatively no wing marks if any?

Not to mention, havn't you seen what a plane does on impact with something hard (like a reinforced building, or ground), it all but disinigrates, there's usually nothing left larger than a square foot in size.

But, they could be right. They could have made 800 people disappear on four different airplanes, flown imaginary non-existant airplanes into buildings, setup hundreds of witnesses at the location of the Pentagon to say that it was a plane, and stolen the identity's of 19 Muslim Extremists, faked their footage of them getting on the airplanes along with the radio transmissions to ground control when they accidentally hit the transmit button instead of the cabin-announcement button, and used it all as a cover up so we could murder 3000 of our own citizens.

 

Um...funny how there's just one engine on the other wing then...

And, I have never ever ever seen an external fuel tank on a commercial jetliner.

 

Southwest has them on most of their cross country non-stop flights, they're usually painted RED on Southwest.

 

Weird. Still though, that wasn't a cross-country flight, was it? And it sure wasn't Southwest