Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Massive wreck in the US GP... Ralf Schumacher might be seriously hurt.

Old Jun 20, 2004 | 05:36 PM
  #11  
axemansean's Avatar
axemansean
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DakarM
as a spectator at home one can never know the full story. so at best you are third guessing what was happening. I'm with harry, I would not come down so hard on FIA.
My comments have been seconded by the BMW Williams team and the Speed tv commentators. Given they are at the site one would hope their word is stronger than mine.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 07:33 PM
  #12  
BassmintPimpin's Avatar
BassmintPimpin
EBP'n It!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Danville, Indiana
Default

I was there in person.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 07:39 PM
  #13  
bluetwo's Avatar
bluetwo
Relevance is irrelevant
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,079
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, HI
Default

i'm happy that Honda has a podium now. Thats good for all of us who love hondas in my opinion.... Sato was the guy to do it so that's cool. It could have been someone else really, as long as Honda can show that it is a serious motor co. Good race too.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 10:30 AM
  #14  
1stGenCRXer's Avatar
1stGenCRXer
GWAKS- Tech Geekifier
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,109
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, VA
Default

FIA rules regarding safety vehicles and response procedures were developed with one thing in mind, speed. The speed that the cars reach. A safety vehicle going in reverse around a track makes the closing speed nearly 300 mph, a rate in which reaction time by the racer or the safety driver is negligible to avoid a head-on. Also, how would you like to jump out on the track while other cars are still at speed, having heard/seen no indication that there is a problem in the corner ahead beyond a yellow flag that is usually not in a prominent viewing position?

At the very least I think the FIA can afford the cash to implement a PA system in the way of a common band voice communications channel to warn all drivers simultaneously of on-track incidents and in what corner. Since F1 drivers are required to be able to speak english in a "functional" manner, there shouldn't be too much of an issue with language barrier. Such a system would also make more sense than the IRL style caution light mounted in the cars, since road courses are much longer and have more blind sections of the track.

In all, I'm sure everyone would have liked the safety crew to have reacted quicker, or have the FIA bunch the field back up and slow them down. In a perfect world, that might even be the most viable solution. As it is, safety car periods and red flags change the entire character of the race, one look back at Monaco tells you that much. Until you're willing to try and play dodgeball with a 220 mph low flying speed machine, I don't think it's really fair to expect safety crews to do a hugely better job than they currently are.
__________________
-Harry
AIM: NDcissive
CRX and Pre '92 Civic, Engine Tech and Tuning, & Track and Autocross Forum Mod
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 01:36 PM
  #15  
DakarM's Avatar
DakarM
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 44,908
Likes: 0
From: Location Location
Default

Originally Posted by axemansean
My comments have been seconded by the BMW Williams team and the Speed tv commentators. Given they are at the site one would hope their word is stronger than mine.

And your point? Of course the team will say the same. The speed tv commentators are probably used to oval courses rather than a road course. Also they are still just spectators.

It takes time to do things right and in a safe manor. Going is when the track is not yet safe will only cause more injuries or worse.
__________________
'00 Dakar Bus CRS Edition
LCD Squad #0001
Originally Posted by WiLL
...I really wanna get out and shoot people.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:32 AM.