Creationism or Evolution?
People confuse the pejorative definition of a theory (i.e. an assumption based on little actual knowledge) with the scientific definition. Science defines a theory as follows:
"A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena."
"A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena."
Originally Posted by 99civic_love
and if you still don't get it then you are just plain stupid.
and i'd rather be called stupid by someone i don't know rather than give up what i strongly believe in. i have yet to see any evidence of macroevolution other than similar looking dna.
Originally Posted by RB26DETT
i have yet to see any evidence of macroevolution other than similar looking dna.
Originally Posted by RB26DETT
it is just macroevolution that i do not think is right.
and i'd rather be called stupid by someone i don't know rather than give up what i strongly believe in. i have yet to see any evidence of macroevolution other than similar looking dna.
and i'd rather be called stupid by someone i don't know rather than give up what i strongly believe in. i have yet to see any evidence of macroevolution other than similar looking dna.
Originally Posted by RB26DETT
then what the freak is macroevolution? all this debating is making me go :loco:
Big change.
Microevolution = Humans to stupid humans (lack of natural selection)
Small change.
Originally Posted by 99civic_love
i guess its kinda hard to pull away from that anthrocentric view your religion bred into your mind.
anyways
i'm one of the most unreligious people you will ever see on a message board
Originally Posted by 99civic_love
and similar looking DNA isn't macroevolution. when i said we share similar DNA with monkeys, thats MICRO evolution. we can prove we are descendant from apes.
Originally Posted by qtiger
Macroevolution = Monkeys to humans (natural selection)
Big change.
Big change.
(oh, btw, 99civic, i'd love to see some solid proof that we are descendant from apes)
Originally Posted by RB26DETT
then what the freak is macroevolution? all this debating is making me go :loco:
macroevolution= big changes, like a simple protein molecule to a fish that can walk on water, etc.
microevolution= smaller changes, like from ape to human, small changes within a species.
we understand that humans evolved from mammals, no problemo. its the original forms of life that are tought to figure out, since the chances of us finding anything about them are slim to none (they don't fossilize well, lol)


