Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Creationism or Evolution?

Old Feb 25, 2004 | 06:54 PM
  #31  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

People confuse the pejorative definition of a theory (i.e. an assumption based on little actual knowledge) with the scientific definition. Science defines a theory as follows:

"A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena."
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:01 PM
  #32  
RB26DETT's Avatar
RB26DETT
Eagles > NFL
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,225
Likes: 0
From: nj
Default

Originally Posted by 99civic_love

and if you still don't get it then you are just plain stupid.
it is just macroevolution that i do not think is right.

and i'd rather be called stupid by someone i don't know rather than give up what i strongly believe in. i have yet to see any evidence of macroevolution other than similar looking dna.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:08 PM
  #33  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Originally Posted by RB26DETT
i have yet to see any evidence of macroevolution other than similar looking dna.
There is even less (or no) evidence for creationism. At least the evolutionists can say that their theory works on a small (small being a couple 100,000 years) scale, whereas creationists have no way to verify their theory.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:08 PM
  #34  
Jessica's Avatar
Jessica
ch1x0r
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,629
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by RB26DETT
it is just macroevolution that i do not think is right.

and i'd rather be called stupid by someone i don't know rather than give up what i strongly believe in. i have yet to see any evidence of macroevolution other than similar looking dna.
i mean you are stupid if you don't understand why its called a theory. and similar looking DNA isn't macroevolution. when i said we share similar DNA with monkeys, thats MICRO evolution. we can prove we are descendant from apes. swallow it, its not too bad. i guess its kinda hard to pull away from that anthrocentric view your religion bred into your mind.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:12 PM
  #35  
RB26DETT's Avatar
RB26DETT
Eagles > NFL
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,225
Likes: 0
From: nj
Default

then what the freak is macroevolution? all this debating is making me go :loco:
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:14 PM
  #36  
qtiger's Avatar
qtiger
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RB26DETT
then what the freak is macroevolution? all this debating is making me go :loco:
Macroevolution = Monkeys to humans (natural selection)
Big change.

Microevolution = Humans to stupid humans (lack of natural selection)
Small change.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:14 PM
  #37  
RB26DETT's Avatar
RB26DETT
Eagles > NFL
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,225
Likes: 0
From: nj
Default

Originally Posted by 99civic_love
i guess its kinda hard to pull away from that anthrocentric view your religion bred into your mind.
:down:

anyways
i'm one of the most unreligious people you will ever see on a message board
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:16 PM
  #38  
RB26DETT's Avatar
RB26DETT
Eagles > NFL
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,225
Likes: 0
From: nj
Default

Originally Posted by 99civic_love
and similar looking DNA isn't macroevolution. when i said we share similar DNA with monkeys, thats MICRO evolution. we can prove we are descendant from apes.
Originally Posted by qtiger
Macroevolution = Monkeys to humans (natural selection)
Big change.
:screwy:

(oh, btw, 99civic, i'd love to see some solid proof that we are descendant from apes)
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:17 PM
  #39  
Jessica's Avatar
Jessica
ch1x0r
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,629
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by RB26DETT
then what the freak is macroevolution? all this debating is making me go :loco:

macroevolution= big changes, like a simple protein molecule to a fish that can walk on water, etc.

microevolution= smaller changes, like from ape to human, small changes within a species.

we understand that humans evolved from mammals, no problemo. its the original forms of life that are tought to figure out, since the chances of us finding anything about them are slim to none (they don't fossilize well, lol)
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:18 PM
  #40  
Jessica's Avatar
Jessica
ch1x0r
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,629
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by RB26DETT
:down:

anyways
i'm one of the most unreligious people you will ever see on a message board

were you raised around religion?
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:31 PM.