Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.
View Poll Results: Wich car would you take?
Honda S2000
25
62.50%
Nissan 350Z
15
37.50%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll

350z or S2k?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 07:21 AM
  #11  
Cosmo M3's Avatar
Cosmo M3
Lurker
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Default

I've never driven the 350Z (something I'll have to do over break) but I've driven the S2K. The S2K is a fun car to drive but knowing that the 350Z has more torque, thats definitely a plus in my book so far.








....I'll still take the S2000 over the 350Z h:
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:22 AM
  #12  
nextgenholmes's Avatar
nextgenholmes
Senior Member Wannabe
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: Mankato Mn
Default

mehh order me that s2k...hehe ... i like 350z's but...gimme a s2k then a 350
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:24 AM
  #13  
Xymox007's Avatar
Xymox007
Björkian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Based on looks: 350Z
Based on power numbers: 350Z
Based on road holding/tracking: S2000
Based on fun level: N/A
Based on everyday practibility: 350Z
Based on costs to maintain: (betting) S2000

Honestly, I'd have to drive both on the street and on the track. If I feel more confident behind the wheel of the less torquey S2000, then by all means I'd get the S2000. Far too many people who call themselves "car enthusiasts" base a cars merit on horsepower figures.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:42 AM
  #14  
sxecrow's Avatar
sxecrow
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,058
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Originally Posted by EG8dood


or



i think id take the 350z :thinking:

The 350z are more a sportcar than the s2k...dunno why but if Honda will do a coupé of the s2k it'd rock it :rockon: but for now id take the 350z..

What would you take?
get a hardtop? :dunno:

Originally Posted by ManInCamo
350Z for sure. With the track/performance package
negative, ghostrider but I think that's just because I'm a Honda nut. 350z is a sweet car.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:46 AM
  #15  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

One thing to keep in mind is that even though the '04 S2k is rated at "240 hp" it actually puts out about 245 hp to the wheels. A typical stock 350Z dynos about 235 hp to the wheels. Granted the Z has a flatter curve and can make pretty significant gains from bolt-on mods, but the '04 S2k actually makes more power than the Z.

Here are some dynos.

'04 S2000 vs '02 S2000 (disregard the "flywheel horsepower" markings)


350Z (blue line is stock, red is with Injen exhaust)
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:50 AM
  #16  
RB's Avatar
RB
snitches get stitches
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by MrFatbooty
One thing to keep in mind is that even though the '04 S2k is rated at "240 hp" it actually puts out about 245 hp to the wheels. A typical stock 350Z dynos about 235 hp to the wheels. Granted the Z has a flatter curve and can make pretty significant gains from bolt-on mods, but the '04 S2k actually makes more power than the Z.

Here are some dynos.
So the the 04 s2k is losing ~25 hp from the flywheel to the wheels, and the 350z is losing ~55 hp? Daaaaamn...
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:52 AM
  #17  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Originally Posted by RB
So the the 04 s2k is losing ~25 hp from the flywheel to the wheels, and the 350z is losing ~55 hp? Daaaaamn...
Well, there's no way to really tell. The '04 S2k is rated at 240 crank hp and puts out 245 wheel hp. The 350Z is rated at 287 crank hp and puts out 235 wheel hp. So technically the S2k actually gains 5 hp from the crank to the wheels.

There's not much point in trying to extrapolate crank hp numbers from wheel hp numbers, so it's best to just compare wheel hp numbers to each other. Using that method, the '04 S2k has about 10 more peak wheel hp.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:58 AM
  #18  
RB's Avatar
RB
snitches get stitches
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by MrFatbooty
Well, there's no way to really tell. The '04 S2k is rated at 240 crank hp and puts out 245 wheel hp. The 350Z is rated at 287 crank hp and puts out 235 wheel hp. So technically the S2k actually gains 5 hp from the crank to the wheels.

There's not much point in trying to extrapolate crank hp numbers from wheel hp numbers, so it's best to just compare wheel hp numbers to each other. Using that method, the '04 S2k has about 10 more peak wheel hp.

on that 1st graph on the right side...what is that 215 number represent?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 10:44 AM
  #19  
reech-around's Avatar
reech-around
RIP Woong.
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 17,284
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca
Default

350Z h:
__________________
.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 11:03 AM
  #20  
Epoch's Avatar
Epoch
CHRISTMASTIME IN IRAQ
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,413
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

I'm about 4 inches too tall for the 350Z, so I didn't bother to drive it, but the S2K was one amazing car to drive. Also, from sitting inside both, the S2K was a LOT better designed in almost every interior respect...

My vote goes with the S2K
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:36 PM.