Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

can somebody please explain to me...

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 30, 2003 | 11:21 PM
  #21  
qtiger's Avatar
qtiger
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Default

Inefficient, heavy, noisy.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2003 | 11:25 PM
  #22  
Black2KGSR's Avatar
Black2KGSR
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 21,463
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Inefficient is what comes to mind for me. :dunno:
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 12:02 AM
  #23  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

"It don't matter if you win with pushrods or with overhead cams--winning's winning!"
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 04:22 AM
  #24  
Bl@ck's Avatar
Bl@ck
Sinner
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,599
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Default

Originally posted by MrFatbooty
"It don't matter if you win with pushrods or with overhead cams--winning's winning!"
BAN!!:db:
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 05:21 AM
  #25  
spanky's Avatar
spanky
I go duffy on dem bitches
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 28,248
Likes: 0
From: Gonzales, Louisiana
Default

they're scared of torque?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 05:51 AM
  #26  
More&Faster's Avatar
More&Faster
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

OHC > pushrods

but....pushrods do the job just fine and i dont see the point in completely changing an engine just to incorporate overhead cams. besides, on a V8 i would think pushrods would be a more inexpensive solution. one came versus two equals cheaper engine.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 06:32 AM
  #27  
w1ngzer0's Avatar
w1ngzer0
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: ArIzOnA
Default

Originally posted by brtecson
"I put $6000 into my integra and I hit a 13.0. You hit a 13.2 hahaha:fawk:"

"My camaro is stockh:. $1000 in mods would put me in the low 12s"

"Another $6000 would put me in the low 12s :squint:"

haha
going to spend 8500 in mods to get 12.5. So... 9800 for a 12.5 car? :thumbup: So does that meen domestic owners can leave me alone??
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 08:40 AM
  #28  
SilverTransAm's Avatar
SilverTransAm
Thread Starter
That's Dirté
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally posted by qtiger
Inefficient, heavy, noisy.
sorry, that's incorrect.

460.9 lbs - LS1 (5.7L) Manual with oil and flywheel
405.5 lbs - LS1 (5.7L) Auto with oil and flexplate

For comparison, the 1998 GT total dressed engine mass (dry) for 1998 is listed as follows:

Manual trans: 529 lbs
Auto trans: 492 lbs

now, these aren't the greatest sources, but it's what i could find real quick.

and what do you mean by inefficcient? hp/liter? or hp/lb?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 08:42 AM
  #29  
Derek's Avatar
Derek
you motorboatin' s.o.b.
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 29,656
Likes: 0
From: Mexico, by Jaymar
Default

um.. if you have to spend $12k in mods to get an import into the 12's, then you got issues and worms. :eek3:
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 08:45 AM
  #30  
w1ngzer0's Avatar
w1ngzer0
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: ArIzOnA
Default

Well i bought the car for 1300. Needs some new parts and the engine is being replaced. I am using mostly new stuff. Plus not ... all of it is engine. probobly.... 1-2k is non engine :thumbup:

Buying the 91 dohc ver. and the 91 tranny just becuase i need a new one. Both rebuilt motors for 305 each
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:03 PM.