H22A vs. B18C
Originally posted by dptkfil
I have to disagree on the turbo part...With proper tuning a lude can handle 10 psi and with just a lower compression head gasket and proper fuel managment, you can boost to 12 psi and reach 240 hp. (of course you don't boost 12psi and expect your engine to last) On the other hand the b18c5, the compression of the engine is a bit higher then h22, and it can't take that much boost.. I haven't see anyone boost more then 8 psi on stock internal...
I have to disagree on the turbo part...With proper tuning a lude can handle 10 psi and with just a lower compression head gasket and proper fuel managment, you can boost to 12 psi and reach 240 hp. (of course you don't boost 12psi and expect your engine to last) On the other hand the b18c5, the compression of the engine is a bit higher then h22, and it can't take that much boost.. I haven't see anyone boost more then 8 psi on stock internal...
with proper tuning, yes.......reliability suffers from every lb of pressure that it goes up......and i've seen 220whp from 7psi, so 12psi isn't necessary.......tuning it well means tuning it lean and supposedly more power and a more stable setup.....giving it a richer a/f ratio to compensate for less ideal tuning is a trick instead of a fix....and the jdm h22a has 10.6:1 CR which isn't really that much more turbo friendly than is the b18cX
here is a link of 240 whp at 7psi on a 99 lude
http://www.h22a.org/t0347psi.htm
Originally posted by monkey
actually tegs only weigh 350 lbs less than a lude.
actually tegs only weigh 350 lbs less than a lude.
that was that day i couldn't add for shit......i THOUGHT that the tegs were around 2650 and the ludes around 3000, which is 350lbs.....where i come up with 500lbs, i do not know
a built h22a1 sleeved with rods/pistons and stock head with cut-down duration psi for psi will make more power than an equally modified h23a1.
i am a firm supporter of the h22a1
probably because i have seen 3 blown h23a1's in the last 12 months (spun #2 CR bearing on all 3 motors)
and i believe its the crank not the bearings themselves
while the h22a1 crank is good to nearly 1000 HP and revs much much higher with no mods, on the order of 8500 no problem, at that rpm the head is the weaklink anyway
~boomer
i am a firm supporter of the h22a1
probably because i have seen 3 blown h23a1's in the last 12 months (spun #2 CR bearing on all 3 motors)
and i believe its the crank not the bearings themselves
while the h22a1 crank is good to nearly 1000 HP and revs much much higher with no mods, on the order of 8500 no problem, at that rpm the head is the weaklink anyway
~boomer
Originally posted by GsrRex88
i love my b18c5, well b18c1 w/itr head.
man 2100lbs is nice in my Crx with that much power.
I sure dont get stomped by preludes.
-Eric
i love my b18c5, well b18c1 w/itr head.
man 2100lbs is nice in my Crx with that much power.
I sure dont get stomped by preludes.
-Eric
i think some dude around here is in the 11's with an all motor h22a in an EG
~boomer
Originally posted by GsrRex88
Yeah i wont be running 11's any time soon.
I really like my current setup though. I plan to drop a bit more weight soon.
I belive weight is just as important as power for having a quick car.
-Eric
Yeah i wont be running 11's any time soon.
I really like my current setup though. I plan to drop a bit more weight soon.
I belive weight is just as important as power for having a quick car.
-Eric
Originally posted by GsrRex88
Thats why no one belives me i can blow the doors off of a gt mustang, even thought its engine has a great deal more torque and HP.
Afterall i have aprox 10lbs per HP at the crank.
-Eric
Thats why no one belives me i can blow the doors off of a gt mustang, even thought its engine has a great deal more torque and HP.
Afterall i have aprox 10lbs per HP at the crank.
-Eric


