Notices
News & Rumors Archives Useful threads, previous Cars of the Week, and more.
View Poll Results: Which $18,000-$22,000 Sporty Compact Would You Buy?
Acura RSX Premium - 2.0L 160HP/141 lb-ft
7
15.56%
Dodge Neon SRT-4 - 2.4L(T) 215HP/245lb-ft
10
22.22%
Ford Focus SVT - 2.0L 170HP/145 lb-ft
0
0%
Honda Civic Si - 2.0L 160HP/141 lb-ft
2
4.44%
Hyundai Tiburon V6 - 2.7L 170HP/181 lb-ft
0
0%
MS Protege - 2.0L(T) 170HP/160 lb-ft
11
24.44%
MINI Cooper S - 1.6L(SC) 163HP/155 lb-ft
10
22.22%
Toyota Celica GT - 1.8L 140HP/125 lb-ft
1
2.22%
Volkswagen GTI - 1.8L(T) 180HP/173 lb-ft
4
8.89%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

HAN Car of the Week 5.26-6.02: 2004 Dodge Neon SRT-4

Thread Tools
 
Old May 28, 2003 | 10:54 AM
  #21  
yianni64's Avatar
yianni64
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
From: Frisco, Texas
Default

I chose MINI Cooper S. SRT-4 sure has a lot of power, but I rather drive around in the MINI.
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 09:13 AM
  #22  
RaceACCORDingly's Avatar
RaceACCORDingly
You are teh suxorz
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Default

id go SRT-4

chrysler has a good warranty so whatever, lol

the mazdaspeed looks good, but its not that fast, plus its all on thr stock 5 speed, the tranny cant hanlde much more power
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 02:22 PM
  #23  
velfarretokyo's Avatar
velfarretokyo
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

I'm biased, I picked the RSX. Its too bad that Acura doesn't offer a Type-S w/o leather because then it'd probably fit under the price cap. Actually, I think I would have gone with the MSP if I was such a biased person.
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 03:26 PM
  #24  
redgoober4life's Avatar
redgoober4life
I eat plastic.
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,177
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Default

I picked the Dodge. It's an amazing car. The interior is cheap (the design isn't awful, it's very ergonomic, and it's quite roomy), but everything comes together well on that car. There is a ton of power, but the handling is great, and the steering is well balanced. The transmission isn't honda-great, but it gets the job done well. The styling is questionable, as always, but I think they did what they could to make a "cute" car into a "performance" oriented car. I think it looks good, actually. It rides pretty well without being harsh, too. That's why I like the SRT-4. Plus, my grandfather was a Mopar man, and I have to keep the tradition alive.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 08:06 AM
  #25  
98CoupeV6's Avatar
98CoupeV6
Thread Starter
lots and lots of fail
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 1
From: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Default

I wish more people picking the Si and RSX would justify their opinions. They're nice cars and have lots of potential, but it's hard to say that they're better than the MSP, Cooper S, GTI or SRT-4.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 08:22 AM
  #26  
jaje's Avatar
jaje
HC Racer H5
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
From: KCK
Default

Originally posted by 98CoupeV6
I wish more people picking the Si and RSX would justify their opinions. They're nice cars and have lots of potential, but it's hard to say that they're better than the MSP, Cooper S, GTI or SRT-4.
the si and the rsx speak quality in every aspect where most of the other cars make short cuts and skimp on other areas of the cars to offer performance...but aside from this higher level of refinement on a honda product, they lack the performance
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 09:50 AM
  #27  
98CoupeV6's Avatar
98CoupeV6
Thread Starter
lots and lots of fail
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 1
From: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Default

Originally posted by jaje
the si and the rsx speak quality in every aspect where most of the other cars make short cuts and skimp on other areas of the cars to offer performance...but aside from this higher level of refinement on a honda product, they lack the performance
Good point. The RSX and Si both have GREAT fit and finish and ergonomics.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 11:32 AM
  #28  
redgoober4life's Avatar
redgoober4life
I eat plastic.
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,177
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Default

I like the RSX, the Si doesn't appeal to me. The Neon is put together fairly well, with good ergonomics, but the materials used could be much better. Oh well.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 11:38 PM
  #29  
asianautica's Avatar
asianautica
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside, CA
Default

Originally posted by jaje
the si and the rsx speak quality in every aspect where most of the other cars make short cuts and skimp on other areas of the cars to offer performance...but aside from this higher level of refinement on a honda product, they lack the performance
Well, every car company make short cuts and skimp somewhere. Most others skim on the interior and put the $$ in performance while Honda skimp on performance and put the $$ in interior quality. Just look at their wheel and tire choices and you can definitely tell where they skimp on.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 04:42 AM
  #30  
jaje's Avatar
jaje
HC Racer H5
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
From: KCK
Default

Originally posted by asianautica
Well, every car company make short cuts and skimp somewhere. Most others skim on the interior and put the $$ in performance while Honda skimp on performance and put the $$ in interior quality. Just look at their wheel and tire choices and you can definitely tell where they skimp on.
i don't mind that honda skimps on the wheels/tires as replacing the wheels/tires is very likely the first step for most who modify their cars...if you skimp on the interior it is much harder to change out and frustrating with squeaks, rattles and broken interior bits
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 PM.