Acura: The Honda That Didn't
04-01-2003, 09:28 PM
#22
chris is the devil
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: so cal 951 + 760
Posts: 8,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by kazi
RSX dash aint ugly, wtf are you talking about?
RSX dash aint ugly, wtf are you talking about?
04-01-2003, 09:38 PM
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
only nice thing about the rsx interior is the seats.. and they arent that great
cmon, a civic si is BARELY slower than an RSX-S... why do ppl like it? just cause its an acura?
cmon, a civic si is BARELY slower than an RSX-S... why do ppl like it? just cause its an acura?
04-01-2003, 09:50 PM
#25
Wannabe yuppie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The luxury market is a rwd market. Honda is not some enlightened champion of front wheel drive, it is a car company. They realize you need rwd to have a real sports car. At some point they'll realize you need power going to the rear wheels to have a real luxury car.
04-02-2003, 12:17 AM
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, CA
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MrFatBooty
The luxury market is a rwd market. Honda is not some enlightened champion of front, it is a car company. They realize you need rwd to have a real sports car. At some point they'll realize you need power going to the rear wheels to have a real luxury car.
The luxury market is a rwd market. Honda is not some enlightened champion of front, it is a car company. They realize you need rwd to have a real sports car. At some point they'll realize you need power going to the rear wheels to have a real luxury car.
04-02-2003, 01:44 PM
#27
lots and lots of fail
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by AadosX
only nice thing about the rsx interior is the seats.. and they arent that great
cmon, a civic si is BARELY slower than an RSX-S... why do ppl like it? just cause its an acura?
only nice thing about the rsx interior is the seats.. and they arent that great
cmon, a civic si is BARELY slower than an RSX-S... why do ppl like it? just cause its an acura?
Samson: Keep it on topic and utilize The Basement.
04-02-2003, 07:51 PM
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to a copy of SCC that I have sitting at my dad's house in montgomery, the Civic SI was 1/10 of a second slower on 0-60 and maybe 3-5/10 of a second slower in the 1/4 mile. They also tested a Home-Made Type-R Civic (Civic SI w/ K23 engine swap... the engine from the RSX-S)... it was a little more than half a second faster than the RSX-S I believe. Yes I have driven one, my friend owns one actually. I know it's a better car, looks a lot better, hatchbacks look like ass IMO, plus it's an Acura. These reasons make it almost 5k more expensive... all I said was that IMO it was ugly, and that it was barely faster than a Civic SI, and I have numbers to back it up... plus I have driven both cars, (test-drove the SI).
04-02-2003, 08:01 PM
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BTW, why did you get so pissed off? I was just making conversation, don't crap your pants dude. Personally the retard comment seems childish.. kinda like my crap joke huh? lol. Either way, don't get too up tight. And better looks, even though I do agree with you, is a personal opinion.